Bence Bagó
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- General Decision Sciences top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wim De NeysGordon PennycookDavid G. RandJonathon McPhetresBalázs AczélAba SzollosiJean‐François BonnefonOlivier Houdé
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (14 papers)Misinformation and Its Impacts (7 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceHungaryUnited States
In The Last Decade
Bence Bagó
27 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Sociology and Political Science 664
- Cognitive Neuroscience 492
- General Decision Sciences 341
- Artificial Intelligence 192
- Communication 182
Countries citing papers authored by Bence Bagó
This map shows the geographic impact of Bence Bagó's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bence Bagó with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bence Bagó more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bence Bagó
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bence Bagó. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bence Bagó. The network helps show where Bence Bagó may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bence Bagó
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bence Bagó. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bence Bagó based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bence Bagó. Bence Bagó is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | Beliefs About COVID-19 in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Novel Test of Political Polarization and Motivated Reasoningbreakdown → | 153 |
| 7 | Beliefs about COVID-19 in Canada, the U.K., and the U.S.A. | 8 |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.breakdown → | 308 |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 94 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | Rise and fall of conflicting intuitions during reasoning. | 3 |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 226 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Bence Bagó
Bence Bagó is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (14 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (7 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (341 citations), Communication (182 citations) and Applied Psychology (131 citations). Bence Bagó has collaborated with scholars based in France, Hungary and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wim De Neys, Gordon Pennycook, David G. Rand, Jonathon McPhetres, Balázs Aczél, Aba Szollosi, Jean‐François Bonnefon, Olivier Houdé, Adam J. Berinsky and Julie Vidal. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Cognition and Neuropsychologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.