Jakub Šrol
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Vladimíra ČavojováEva Ballová MikuškováLjiljana B. LazarevićJéssica Esther Machado FariasGaëlle MarintheCameron S. KayIrena Pavela BanaiHui Bai
- Topics
- Misinformation and Its Impacts (16 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers)Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
Jakub Šrol
29 papers receiving 739 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Sociology and Political Science 515
- Cognitive Neuroscience 289
- Health 227
- Clinical Psychology 149
- Social Psychology 92
Countries citing papers authored by Jakub Šrol
This map shows the geographic impact of Jakub Šrol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jakub Šrol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jakub Šrol more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jakub Šrol
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jakub Šrol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jakub Šrol. The network helps show where Jakub Šrol may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jakub Šrol
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jakub Šrol. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jakub Šrol based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jakub Šrol. Jakub Šrol is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: A systematic reviewbreakdown → | 193 |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID‐19 pandemicbreakdown → | 136 |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Jakub Šrol
Jakub Šrol is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Family Practice and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 34 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (16 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (12 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (52 citations), Health (227 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (289 citations). Jakub Šrol has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Czechia and France. Frequent co-authors include Vladimíra Čavojová, Eva Ballová Mikušková, Ljiljana B. Lazarević, Jéssica Esther Machado Farias, Gaëlle Marinthe, Cameron S. Kay, Irena Pavela Banai, Hui Bai, Iris Žeželj and Valerie van Mulukom. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Personality and Individual Differences and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.