Ben Wiffen

965 total citations
8 papers, 658 citations indexed

About

Ben Wiffen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Ben Wiffen has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 658 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 2 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Ben Wiffen's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (1 paper). Ben Wiffen is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (1 paper). Ben Wiffen collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Denmark. Ben Wiffen's co-authors include Anthony S. David, Nicholas Bedford, James Gilleen, Manuela Russo, Simona A. Stilo, Robin Murray, Sonija Luzi, Carmine M. Pariante, Marta Di Forti and Tiago Reis Marques and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Ben Wiffen

8 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ben Wiffen United Kingdom	4	298	248	147	144	120	8	658
Caterina La Cascia Italy	14	281 0.9×	273 1.1×	101 0.7×	232 1.6×	70 0.6×	56	719
Alexandra Macgregor France	13	212 0.7×	229 0.9×	143 1.0×	140 1.0×	91 0.8×	22	720
Nehal P. Vadhan United States	17	241 0.8×	256 1.0×	255 1.7×	117 0.8×	191 1.6×	44	802
C. Gindre France	7	268 0.9×	318 1.3×	59 0.4×	111 0.8×	109 0.9×	8	529
Rachel A. Rabin Canada	14	381 1.3×	244 1.0×	136 0.9×	111 0.8×	75 0.6×	40	756
Mark McGee United States	6	91 0.3×	476 1.9×	71 0.5×	147 1.0×	73 0.6×	7	691
N. Ciani Italy	13	114 0.4×	320 1.3×	62 0.4×	138 1.0×	128 1.1×	34	583
Thomas Bronisch Germany	14	70 0.2×	196 0.8×	95 0.6×	410 2.8×	101 0.8×	36	802
Tania Pampoulova Canada	14	66 0.2×	349 1.4×	208 1.4×	147 1.0×	132 1.1×	24	579
Michael Gänsicke Germany	17	87 0.3×	309 1.2×	280 1.9×	430 3.0×	241 2.0×	24	996

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Wiffen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Wiffen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Wiffen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Wiffen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Wiffen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Wiffen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Wiffen. The network helps show where Ben Wiffen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Wiffen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Wiffen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Wiffen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Wiffen. Ben Wiffen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

David, Anthony S., et al.. (2013). Failures of metacognition and lack of insight in neuropsychiatric disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 369(1634). 1 indexed citations

2.

David, Anthony S., Nicholas Bedford, Ben Wiffen, & James Gilleen. (2012). Failures of metacognition and lack of insight in neuropsychiatric disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 367(1594). 1379–1390. 163 indexed citations

3.

Falcone, M. Aurora, Ben Wiffen, Jennifer O’Connor, et al.. (2010). JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS AND PSYCHOSIS. Schizophrenia Research. 117(2-3). 294–294. 1 indexed citations

4.

Wiffen, Ben, M. Aurora Falcone, Jennifer O’Connor, et al.. (2010). BIAS OR DEFICIT? DIFFERENCES IN IQ AND INSIGHT IN FIRST EPISODE PSYCHOSIS PATIENTS WHO DEMONSTRATE A 'JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS' RESPONSE ON THE BEADS TASK. Schizophrenia Research. 117(2-3). 446–446. 1 indexed citations

5.

Stilo, Simona A., Craig Morgan, Clare Flach, et al.. (2010). SOCIAL DISADVANTAGE: CAUSE OR CONSEQUENCE OF IMPENDING PSYCHOSIS?. Schizophrenia Research. 117(2-3). 181–181. 1 indexed citations

6.

Forti, Marta Di, Craig Morgan, Paola Dazzan, et al.. (2009). High-potency cannabis and the risk of psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 195(6). 488–491. 389 indexed citations

7.

Lobmaier, Janek S., Reiner Sprengelmeyer, Ben Wiffen, & David I. Perrett. (2009). Female and male responses to cuteness, age and emotion in infant faces. Evolution and Human Behavior. 31(1). 16–21. 92 indexed citations

8.

Wiffen, Ben & Anthony S. David. (2009). Metacognition, mindreading, and insight in schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 32(2). 161–162. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact