Ben Reason

559 total citations
11 papers, 307 citations indexed

About

Ben Reason is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Ben Reason has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 307 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Ben Reason's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Service and Product Innovation (2 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper). Ben Reason is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Service and Product Innovation (2 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper). Ben Reason collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Hungary and United Kingdom. Ben Reason's co-authors include Greg Webster, Michael Terner, Chris Downs, R. Sacha Bhatia, Karen Born, Jérémy Veillard, Zachary Bouck, Wendy Levinson, Ciara Pendrith and Kyle R. Kirkham and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Health Services Research, Health Policy and Family Practice.

In The Last Decade

Ben Reason

11 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ben Reason Canada	8	80	75	71	70	39	11	307
C. Blok Netherlands	14	40 0.5×	42 0.6×	168 2.4×	68 1.0×	11 0.3×	33	535
Maria Lluch Spain	6	29 0.4×	38 0.5×	15 0.2×	174 2.5×	6 0.2×	8	356
Jos Aarts Netherlands	14	87 1.1×	14 0.2×	8 0.1×	143 2.0×	19 0.5×	25	660
M. Berg Netherlands	8	44 0.6×	14 0.2×	13 0.2×	177 2.5×	24 0.6×	8	631
John W. Kenagy United States	5	27 0.3×	103 1.4×	20 0.3×	217 3.1×	3 0.1×	9	467
Carly Daley United States	11	13 0.2×	13 0.2×	14 0.2×	179 2.6×	59 1.5×	27	355
Sohail Kamran Pakistan	10	30 0.4×	98 1.3×	25 0.4×	41 0.6×	2 0.1×	34	404
E Byrne United Kingdom	4	20 0.3×	23 0.3×	9 0.1×	169 2.4×	9 0.2×	6	416
Flemming Witt Udsen Denmark	12	6 0.1×	29 0.4×	11 0.2×	181 2.6×	15 0.4×	30	479
Grazia Antonacci United Kingdom	7	6 0.1×	51 0.7×	17 0.2×	92 1.3×	5 0.1×	23	297

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Reason

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Reason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Reason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Reason more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Reason

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Reason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Reason. The network helps show where Ben Reason may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Reason

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Reason. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Reason based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Reason. Ben Reason is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Reason, Ben, et al.. (2023). Access to Palliative Care in Canada. Healthcare Quarterly. 26(2). 6–8. 7 indexed citations

2.

Reason, Ben, Erin Pichora, & Tracy Johnson. (2022). How were Wait Times for Priority Procedures in Canada Impacted during the First Six Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic?. Healthcare Quarterly. 24(4). 11–15. 5 indexed citations

3.

Bouck, Zachary, Ciara Pendrith, Xi-Kuan Chen, et al.. (2019). Measuring the frequency and variation of unnecessary care across Canada. BMC Health Services Research. 19(1). 446–446. 31 indexed citations

4.

Reason, Ben, et al.. (2015). Service Design for Business: A Practical Guide to Optimizing the Customer Experience. 14 indexed citations

5.

Reason, Ben, et al.. (2015). Service Design for Business. 11 indexed citations

6.

Reason, Ben, et al.. (2013). Service Design: From Insight to Implementation. 97 indexed citations

7.

Veillard, Jérémy, et al.. (2013). Methods to stimulate national and sub-national benchmarking through international health system performance comparisons: A Canadian approach. Health Policy. 112(1-2). 141–147. 14 indexed citations

8.

Reason, Ben, et al.. (2013). Orange: A Service Design Case Study. Design Management Review. 24(3). 48–49. 1 indexed citations

9.

Reason, Ben, et al.. (2012). The impact of polypharmacy on the health of Canadian seniors. Family Practice. 29(4). 427–432. 82 indexed citations

10.

Terner, Michael, et al.. (2011). Chronic Conditions More Than Age Drive Health System Use in Canadian Seniors. Healthcare Quarterly. 14(3). 19–22. 34 indexed citations

11.

Downs, Chris, et al.. (2008). Bottom‐line Experiences: Measuring the Value of Design in Service. Design Management Review. 19(1). 73–79. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact