Ben Reason
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Family Practice top 10%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 1
- Co-authors
- Greg Webster (2 shared papers)Michael Terner (2 shared papers)Chris Downs (1 shared paper)Wendy Levinson (1 shared paper)Ciara Pendrith (1 shared paper)Xi-Kuan Chen (1 shared paper)R. Sacha Bhatia (1 shared paper)Jérémy Veillard (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Health Services Research (1 paper)Family Practice (1 paper)Health Policy (1 paper)Healthcare Quarterly (2 papers)Design Management Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaHungaryUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ben Reason
11 papers receiving 279 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 80
- Family Practice 29
- Marketing 71
- Human-Computer Interaction 39
- Medical Terminology 1
Countries citing papers authored by Ben Reason
This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Reason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Reason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Reason more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Reason
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Reason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Reason. The network helps show where Ben Reason may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Ben Reason, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Service Design: From Insight to Implementation | 2013 | 97 |
| 2 | 2012 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 6 | Service Design for Business: A Practical Guide to Optimizing the Customer Experience | 2015 | 14 |
| 7 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 1 |
About Ben Reason
Ben Reason is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Marketing, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions, having authored 11 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Service and Product Innovation (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (80 citations), Family Practice (29 citations), Marketing (71 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (39 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Ben Reason has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Hungary and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Greg Webster, Michael Terner, Chris Downs, Wendy Levinson, Ciara Pendrith, Xi-Kuan Chen, R. Sacha Bhatia, Jérémy Veillard, Kyle R. Kirkham and Karen Born. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, Family Practice, Health Policy, Healthcare Quarterly and Design Management Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.