Ben Givens
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Martin SarterJohn P. BrunoMichael E. HasselmoThomas M. GillDavid S. OltonLinda K. GormanKate KarelinaJohn I. Broussard
- Topics
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms (12 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers)Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ben Givens
13 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 841
- Molecular Biology 501
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 203
- Psychiatry and Mental health 176
Countries citing papers authored by Ben Givens
This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Givens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Givens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Givens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Givens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Givens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Givens. The network helps show where Ben Givens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Givens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Givens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Givens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Givens. Ben Givens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42 | |
| 2 | Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detectionbreakdown → | 522 |
| 3 | 226 | |
| 4 | The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-upbreakdown → | 847 |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 191 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 54 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 54 | |
| 13 | 44 |
About Ben Givens
Ben Givens is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (841 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (99 citations). Ben Givens has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin Sarter, John P. Bruno, Michael E. Hasselmo, Thomas M. Gill, David S. Olton, Linda K. Gorman, Kate Karelina, John I. Broussard, Karyn M. Frick and Kevin Pang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PEDIATRICS and Brain Research Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.