Ben Gillen

518 total citations
11 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

Ben Gillen is a scholar working on Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Ben Gillen has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Finance, 4 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 3 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Ben Gillen's work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (4 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (3 papers). Ben Gillen is often cited by papers focused on Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (4 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (3 papers). Ben Gillen collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Ben Gillen's co-authors include Leeat Yariv, Erik Snowberg, Russ Wermers, Allan Timmermann, Matthew Shum, Hyungsik Roger Moon, Charles R. Plott, Alex Weir and Walter Rossi and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Financial Economics, Journal of Political Economy and Mycologia.

In The Last Decade

Ben Gillen

11 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ben Gillen United States	5	110	99	81	81	65	11	296
Oleg Korenok United States	13	203 1.8×	181 1.8×	83 1.0×	72 0.9×	41 0.6×	35	404
Ranoua Bouchouicha United Kingdom	6	159 1.4×	73 0.7×	32 0.4×	120 1.5×	38 0.6×	8	309
Isabel Trevino United States	9	106 1.0×	144 1.5×	52 0.6×	93 1.1×	27 0.4×	14	291
Alexander Klos Germany	8	118 1.1×	28 0.3×	104 1.3×	97 1.2×	78 1.2×	22	240
T. Parker Ballinger United States	6	183 1.7×	84 0.8×	20 0.2×	174 2.1×	34 0.5×	11	290
Julius Pahlke Germany	5	96 0.9×	138 1.4×	24 0.3×	163 2.0×	21 0.3×	5	276
Florian Lindner Austria	11	218 2.0×	227 2.3×	167 2.1×	193 2.4×	81 1.2×	19	473
Sandro Ambuehl Switzerland	9	98 0.9×	58 0.6×	17 0.2×	54 0.7×	50 0.8×	24	230
Ananda R. Ganguly United States	8	76 0.7×	78 0.8×	100 1.2×	87 1.1×	160 2.5×	14	352
Hubert János Kiss Hungary	9	158 1.4×	84 0.8×	159 2.0×	48 0.6×	120 1.8×	46	326

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Gillen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Gillen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Gillen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Gillen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Gillen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Gillen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Gillen. The network helps show where Ben Gillen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Gillen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Gillen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Gillen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Gillen. Ben Gillen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Gillen, Ben, Erik Snowberg, & Leeat Yariv. (2018). Experimenting with Measurement Error: Techniques with Applications to the Caltech Cohort Study. Journal of Political Economy. 127(4). 1826–1863. 190 indexed citations

2.

Gillen, Ben, et al.. (2015). BLP-Lasso for Aggregate Discrete Choice Models of Elections with Rich Demographic Covariates. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

3.

Gillen, Ben, et al.. (2015). BLP-Lasso for Aggregate Discrete Choice Models of Elections with Rich Demographic Covariates. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

4.

Gillen, Ben, Matthew Shum, & Hyungsik Roger Moon. (2015). Demand Estimation with High-Dimensional Product Characteristics. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

5.

Gillen, Ben, Charles R. Plott, & Matthew Shum. (2015). A Pari-Mutuel-Like Mechanism for Information Aggregation: A Field Test Inside Intel. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

6.

Gillen, Ben, et al.. (2013). The cross section of conditional mutual fund performance in European stock markets. Journal of Financial Economics. 108(3). 699–726. 64 indexed citations

7.

Gillen, Ben, et al.. (2011). Mutual Fund Return Predictability in Partially Segmented Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10 indexed citations

8.

Gillen, Ben, et al.. (2011). Mutual Fund Return Predictability in Partially Segmented Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

9.

Timmermann, Allan, et al.. (2009). The Performance of European Equity Mutual Funds. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

10.

Gillen, Ben. (2009). Identification and Estimation of Level-K Auctions. SSRN Electronic Journal. 18 indexed citations

11.

Weir, Alex, et al.. (2004). Stigmatomyces from New Zealand and New Caledonia: New Records, New Species and Two New Host Families. Mycologia. 96(4). 834–834. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact