Ben Caplan

983 citations
33 papers · 367 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ben Caplan

32 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Ben Caplan
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • History and Philosophy of Science 147
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 276
  • Philosophy 210
  • Music 37
  • Literature and Literary Theory 29
Replace Simon J. Evnine with:
Simon J. Evnine United States
Guy Rohrbaugh United States
David Robb United Kingdom
Alberto Voltolini Italy
Bruce Vermazen United States
Benjamin Schnieder Germany
Anthony Everett United Kingdom
Richard Sharvy United States
Leonard Linsky United States
Alan Sidelle United States
Ben Caplan relative to Simon J. Evnine United States Simon J. Evnine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Simon J. Evnine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Caplan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Caplan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Caplan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Caplan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Caplan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Caplan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Caplan. The network helps show where Ben Caplan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ben Caplan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Caplan Line = papers co-authored together Ben Caplan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201147
2 201040
3 200532
4 200427
5 200122
6
CREATURES OF FICTION, MYTH, AND IMAGINATION
200420
7 200318
8 201017
9 200617
10 201115
11 200713
12 20149
13 20089
14 20058
15 20138
16 20127
17 20077
18 20147
19 20066
20 20175

About Ben Caplan

Ben Caplan is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 33 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (21 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (14 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (3 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (3 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (147 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (276 citations), Philosophy (210 citations), Music (37 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (29 citations). Ben Caplan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Carl Matheson and Timothy Schroeder. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Aesthetics, Philosophical Studies, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Philosophy Compass.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact