Beat Reber
Impact in
- Accounting top 5%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Working Capital and Financial Performance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Papers in
-
- Corporate Finance and Governance 9
- Private Equity and Venture Capital 5
- Working Capital and Financial Performance 1
- Finance 7
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 6
- Capital Investment and Risk Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- Stefan Gold (1 shared paper)Carole Howorth (1 shared paper)Dev Vencappa (1 shared paper)Steve Toms (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Review of Financial Analysis (2 papers)European Journal of Finance (1 paper)Managerial and Decision Economics (1 paper)Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management (1 paper)Journal of Business Ethics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyGermany
In The Last Decade
Beat Reber
9 papers receiving 394 citations
Beat Reber's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Accounting 202
- Strategy and Management 211
- Marketing 108
- Finance 81
- Economics and Econometrics 127
Countries citing papers authored by Beat Reber
This map shows the geographic impact of Beat Reber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beat Reber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beat Reber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beat Reber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beat Reber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beat Reber. The network helps show where Beat Reber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Beat Reber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 282 |
| 2 | 2003 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 10 | Firm Resources and Quality Signalling: Evidence from UK Initial Public Offerings | 2005 | 0 |
About Beat Reber
Beat Reber is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance, Strategy and Management, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (6 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (5 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (1 paper), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (1 paper), Business Strategies and Innovation (1 paper), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (1 paper) and Working Capital and Financial Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (202 citations), Strategy and Management (211 citations), Marketing (108 citations), Finance (81 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (127 citations). Beat Reber has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Gold, Carole Howorth, Dev Vencappa and Steve Toms. Their work appears in journals such as International Review of Financial Analysis, European Journal of Finance, Managerial and Decision Economics, Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management and Journal of Business Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.