Beat Neuenschwander

44 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Use of historical control data for assessing treatment ef...20132026201720212013100200300

Peers

Beat Neuenschwander
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Statistics and Probability 1.5k
  • Economics and Econometrics 545
  • Management Science and Operations Research 450
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 314
  • Molecular Biology 227
Replace Joseph F. Heyse with:
Joseph F. Heyse United States
Lei Nie United States
Helena Geys Belgium
Erica Brittain United States
Robin Henderson United Kingdom
Emmanuelle Comets France
Devan V. Mehrotra United States
Didier Renard Belgium
Karim F. Hirji United States
Laura Thompson United States
Beat Neuenschwander relative to Joseph F. Heyse United States Joseph F. Heyse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Joseph F. Heyse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beat Neuenschwander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beat Neuenschwander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beat Neuenschwander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beat Neuenschwander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beat Neuenschwander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beat Neuenschwander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beat Neuenschwander. The network helps show where Beat Neuenschwander may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beat Neuenschwander

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beat Neuenschwander. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beat Neuenschwander based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beat Neuenschwander. Beat Neuenschwander is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 127
3 89
4 23
5 18
6 129
7 63
8 260
9 24
10 12
11 8
12
Trends in the prevalence of infection with mycobacterium tuberculosis in Korea from 1965 to 1995: an analysis of seven surveys by mixture models.
34
13 73
14 24
15 6
16 2
17 31
18 1
19 18
20 48

About Beat Neuenschwander

Beat Neuenschwander is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (22 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (9 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (1.5k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (314 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (450 citations). Beat Neuenschwander has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Branson, David J. Spiegelhalter, Satrajit Roychoudhury, Simon Wandel, Thomas Gsponer, Heinz Schmidli, Gorana Capkun-Niggli, Tim Friede, Christian Röver and Sandro Gsteiger. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Epidemiology, Biometrics and Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026