Barbara Vetter

48 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Barbara Vetter
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • History and Philosophy of Science 251
  • Philosophy 397
  • Clinical Biochemistry 221
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 416
  • Internal Medicine 97
Replace Jacqueline Taylor with:
Jacqueline Taylor United States
Francis S. Collins United States
Susanne Winkler Germany
Andrew S. Moore Australia
Diana Blank Switzerland
Sabine Braun United Kingdom
Doron M. Behar Israel
Jean-François Mattéi France
Salem Abbès Tunisia
Rosemary A. Fisher United Kingdom
Barbara Vetter relative to Jacqueline Taylor United States Jacqueline Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×80×97×
Jacqueline Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Vetter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Vetter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Vetter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Vetter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Vetter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Vetter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Vetter. The network helps show where Barbara Vetter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Vetter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara Vetter Line = papers co-authored together Barbara Vetter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001194
2 2015162
3 201594
4 200591
5 201468
6 201165
7 200048
8 201247
9 199741
10 201341
11 201939
12 201138
13 199736
14 201136
15 200032
16 202327
17
How many meanings for ‘may’? The case for modal polysemy
201625
18 201625
19 199824
20
'CAN' WITHOUT POSSIBLE WORLDS: SEMANTICS FOR ANTI-HUMEANS
201323

About Barbara Vetter

Barbara Vetter is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Epidemiology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (18 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (5 papers) and Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (251 citations), Philosophy (397 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (221 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (416 citations) and Internal Medicine (97 citations). Barbara Vetter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Julia B. Hennermann, E. Mönch, Patrick Hundsdoerfer, A. E. Kulozik, Andreas E. Kulozik, Matthias W. Hentze, Gabriele Neu‐Yilik, Niels H. Gehring, Christoph Bührer and Lüder Wiebusch. Their work appears in journals such as Mind, Synthese, Nature Communications, British Journal of Haematology and Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact