Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
THE CONCEPT OF CARRIER TRANSPORT AND ITS COROLLARIES IN PHARMACOLOGY
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Rosenberg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Rosenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Rosenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Rosenberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Rosenberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Rosenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Rosenberg. The network helps show where Thomas Rosenberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Rosenberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Rosenberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Rosenberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Rosenberg. Thomas Rosenberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tompson, Stuart W., et al.. (2016). Whole Exome Sequencing Identifies a Rare Variant Co-segregating with High Myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 3606–3606.1 indexed citations
Baraas, Rigmor C., et al.. (2011). Cone Density And Color Discrimination In Oligocone Trichromacy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(14). 3197–3197.1 indexed citations
8.
Rha, Jungtae, Melissa Wagner-Schuman, Anthony T. Moore, et al.. (2010). Adaptive Optics Imaging of the Cone Mosaic in Oligocone Trichromacy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 6296–6296.1 indexed citations
9.
Bech‐Hansen, N. Torben, Catrina M. Loucks, Chandree L. Beaulieu, et al.. (2010). Mutation Analysis in a Cohort of CSNB Patients: Novel Mutations in TRPM1 Gene. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 4129–4129.1 indexed citations
10.
Robitaille, Johane M., et al.. (2009). Phenotypic Variability in Genetically Defined X-linked Congenital Stationary Night Blindness. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 3721–3721.2 indexed citations
11.
Grønskov, Karen, et al.. (2006). Bardet–Biedl Syndrome: Does BBS2 Result in A More Serious Phenotype Than BBS1?. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 4621–4621.
Thiselton, Dawn L., Christiane Alexander, Susan Sklower Brooks, et al.. (2001). OPA1 gene mutations cluster in functional protein domains in ADOA patients and reveal a founder allele in the Danish population.. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
Rosenberg, Thomas, et al.. (1995). Hereditær opticusatrofi. En klinisk-genealogisk status over danske "Leber-slægter". Ugeskrift for Læger. 2707–2711.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.