Barbara Hardy
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- History top 5%
- Education
- Co-authors
- George EliotGordon S. HaightWayne C. BoothMiriam AllottRobert L. GaleBernard J. ParisLaurence LernerMaria R. Finckh
- Topics
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism (7 papers)Modernist Literature and Criticism (5 papers)Poetry Analysis and Criticism (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Barbara Hardy
36 papers receiving 187 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Literature and Literary Theory 187
- Sociology and Political Science 93
- Philosophy 54
- History 48
- Education 31
Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Hardy
This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Hardy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Hardy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Hardy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Hardy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Hardy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Hardy. The network helps show where Barbara Hardy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barbara Hardy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barbara Hardy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barbara Hardy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Barbara Hardy. Barbara Hardy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | George Eliot: A Critic's Biography | 0 |
| 5 | Shakespeare's storytellers : dramatic narration | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Forms of Feeling in Victorian Fiction | 12 |
| 10 | Charles Dickens, the writer and his work | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Dramatic quicklyisms : malapropic wordplay technique in Shakespeare's Henriad | 1 |
| 13 | Tellers and listeners | 2 |
| 14 | A reading of Jane Austen | 4 |
| 15 | 87 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Barbara Hardy
Barbara Hardy is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 52 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (7 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (5 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (187 citations), Philosophy (54 citations) and History (48 citations). Barbara Hardy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include George Eliot, Gordon S. Haight, Wayne C. Booth, Miriam Allott, Robert L. Gale, Bernard J. Paris, Laurence Lerner, Maria R. Finckh, Shengyun Peng and T. W. Mew. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, World Literature Today and Modern Language Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.