Barbara D’Amen
Impact in
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
- Demography top 10%
- Technology Use by Older Adults
Papers in
-
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 5
- Social and Demographic Issues in Germany 2
-
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 7
- Family Support in Illness 6
- Youth Education and Societal Dynamics 4
- Co-authors
- Sara Santini (11 shared papers)Marco Socci (13 shared papers)Johannes Kropf (2 shared papers)Vera Stara (2 shared papers)Maria Gabriella Melchiorre (5 shared papers)Giovanni Lamura (4 shared papers)Valentina Hlebec (4 shared papers)Elizabeth Hanson (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Barbara D’Amen
16 papers receiving 205 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 21
- Demography 49
- Conservation 13
- Health 24
- General Health Professions 67
Countries citing papers authored by Barbara D’Amen
This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara D’Amen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara D’Amen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara D’Amen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara D’Amen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara D’Amen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara D’Amen. The network helps show where Barbara D’Amen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Barbara D’Amen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 43 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1 |
About Barbara D’Amen
Barbara D’Amen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Health and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (7 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (2 papers) and Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (21 citations), Demography (49 citations), Conservation (13 citations), Health (24 citations) and General Health Professions (67 citations). Barbara D’Amen has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Sweden and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Sara Santini, Marco Socci, Johannes Kropf, Vera Stara, Maria Gabriella Melchiorre, Giovanni Lamura, Valentina Hlebec, Elizabeth Hanson, Sabrina Quattrini and Lennart Magnusson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research, BioMed Research International, Frontiers in Psychology and BMC Geriatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.