B Theis
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Parasites and Host Interactions 3
- Oncology 11
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 9
- Co-authors
- R C G RussellJohn P. NeoptolemosS. BramhallSimon R. BramhallR C N WilliamsonGünter KlöppelColm O’SullivanT. N. Walsh
- Journals
- British Journal of Cancer (2 papers)Gut (2 papers)British journal of surgery (2 papers)Radiology (2 papers)The American Journal of Surgical Pathology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
B Theis
20 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Oncology 1.0k
- Surgery 742
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 385
- Gastroenterology 60
- Cancer Research 152
Countries citing papers authored by B Theis
This map shows the geographic impact of B Theis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B Theis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B Theis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by B Theis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B Theis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B Theis. The network helps show where B Theis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside B Theis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 67 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 62 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 27 | |
| 11 | Workshop report: physical activity and cancer prevention. | 2000 | 25 |
| 12 | Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. | 1997 | 278 |
| 13 | 1997 | 165 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 65 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 121 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 96 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 313 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 43 |
About B Theis
B Theis is a scholar working on Parasitology, Oncology, Surgery, Cancer Research and Health Information Management, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (7 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (4 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (3 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (3 papers), Parasitic infections in humans and animals (2 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.0k citations), Surgery (742 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (385 citations), Gastroenterology (60 citations) and Cancer Research (152 citations). B Theis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R C G Russell, John P. Neoptolemos, S. Bramhall, Simon R. Bramhall, R C N Williamson, Günter Klöppel, Colm O’Sullivan, T. N. Walsh, J. Rode and W R Lees. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Gut, British journal of surgery, Radiology and The American Journal of Surgical Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.