Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by B. N. Mehrotra
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of B. N. Mehrotra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. N. Mehrotra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. N. Mehrotra more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. N. Mehrotra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. N. Mehrotra. The network helps show where B. N. Mehrotra may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. N. Mehrotra
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. N. Mehrotra.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. N. Mehrotra based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. N. Mehrotra. B. N. Mehrotra is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mehrotra, B. N., et al.. (2003). Pharmacognostic Evaluation of Ratanjot-Arnebia nobilis Rech. f.. Natural Product Sciences. 9(4). 286–290.6 indexed citations
Goel, A. K., et al.. (1990). Oxytropis shivai (Fabaceae) - a new species from Ladakh (India).. Indian Journal of Forestry. 13(3). 257–259.1 indexed citations
7.
BHAKUNI, D. S., et al.. (1990). Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: Part XIV.. PubMed. 28(7). 619–37.21 indexed citations
Ansari, Rizwan Ali, Ramesh Chander, B. N. Dhawan, et al.. (1988). Hepatoprotective activity of kutkin--the iridoid glycoside mixture of Picrorhiza kurrooa.. PubMed. 87. 401–4.73 indexed citations
13.
BHAKUNI, D. S., et al.. (1984). Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: Part X.. PubMed. 22(6). 312–32.67 indexed citations
14.
Mehrotra, B. N., et al.. (1983). New records of plants from himachal pradesh india 3. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND TAXONOMIC BOTANY. 4(3). 991–994.3 indexed citations
15.
Mehrotra, B. N., et al.. (1980). Contribution to the flora of Lahul valley (north-west Himalaya) -- I. Some new plant records.. Indian Journal of Forestry. 3(2). 154–155.
16.
Mehrotra, B. N., et al.. (1980). Contribution to the flora of Lahul valley (north-west Himalaya) - II. Some new plant records.. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND TAXONOMIC BOTANY. 1. 115–117.
17.
Dhawan, B. N., et al.. (1980). Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: Part IX.. PubMed. 18(6). 594–606.79 indexed citations
18.
Dhar, Monica, M.M. Dhar, B. N. Dhawan, et al.. (1973). Screening of Indian Plants for Biological Activity: Part IV.32 indexed citations
19.
Dhar, Monica, et al.. (1969). SCREENING OF INDIAN PLANTS FOR BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY. PART-II. 7. 250–262.173 indexed citations
20.
Dhar, Monica, et al.. (1968). SCREENING OF INDIAN PLANTS FOR BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY: PART I. 3(6). 232–247.267 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.