Countries where authors publish in Nordic Journal of Botany
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nordic Journal of Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nordic Journal of Botany more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany.
About Nordic Journal of Botany
The 3.5k papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany in the last decades have received a total of 34.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Nordic Journal of Botany usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.4k papers), Plant Science (2.1k papers) and Forestry (123 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (1.2k papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (985 papers), Plant and animal studies (766 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (544 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (323 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (317 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (306 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (301 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nordic Journal of Botany are Susanne S. Renner, Wilhelm Barthlott, Kai Larsen, Rolf Dahlgren, Rune Halvorsen Økland, Ove Eriksson, Bent Vad Odgaard, Leif Tibell, Mats Thulin and Lars Söderström.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.