B. L. Williams

923 total citations
20 papers, 679 citations indexed

About

B. L. Williams is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, B. L. Williams has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 679 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Genetics, 5 papers in Ecology and 5 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in B. L. Williams's work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (5 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers). B. L. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (5 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers). B. L. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. B. L. Williams's co-authors include J. W. Knight, William H. Velander, Louis A. Matis, Joseph A. Madri, S P Squinto, William L. Fodor, F.C. Gwazdauskas, Charles J. McGrath, John D. Jacobson and Jeff C. Ko and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The EMBO Journal and The Plant Cell.

In The Last Decade

B. L. Williams

18 papers receiving 655 citations

Peers

B. L. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Surgery 247
  • Genetics 241
  • Molecular Biology 201
  • Immunology 175
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 73
Replace Pascale Mercier with:
Pascale Mercier France
M. Sasaki Japan
Norma Moreno-Méndoza Mexico
Katsuhiro FUKUTA Japan
Rudolf Leiser Germany
Kellie A. Fecteau United States
José Roberto Kfoury Brazil
Shelley Valle United States
Alon M. Levy Israel
Neale Fretwell United Kingdom
Pascale Mercier France View profile →
Citations per field, relative to B. L. Williams
B. L. Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to B. L. Williams
B. L. Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by B. L. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. L. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. L. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. L. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. L. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. L. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. L. Williams. The network helps show where B. L. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. L. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. L. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. L. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. L. Williams. B. L. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 0
3 2
4 3
5 3
6 5
7
Genetic analysis reveals domain interactions of Arabidopsis Hsp100/ClpB and cooperation with the sHsp chaperone system.
1
8 45
9 9
10 168
11 0
12 275
13
Comparison of Telazol, Telazol-ketamine, Telazol-xylazine, and Telazol-ketamine-xylazine as chemical restraint and anesthetic induction combination in swine.
60
14 6
15 4
16 14
17 40
18 12
19 25
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026