B. Jacquot

1.6k total citations
31 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

B. Jacquot is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, B. Jacquot has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 12 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in B. Jacquot's work include Nuclear physics research studies (14 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (11 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (6 papers). B. Jacquot is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (14 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (11 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (6 papers). B. Jacquot collaborates with scholars based in France, Spain and India. B. Jacquot's co-authors include M. Rejmund, A. Navin, Ph. Chomaz, M. Colonna, C. Schmitt, G. de France, A. Lemasson, A. Guarnera, O. Delaune and S. Ayık and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

B. Jacquot

28 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
B. Jacquot France 12 308 158 130 44 26 31 366
M. Papa Italy 13 377 1.2× 142 0.9× 178 1.4× 46 1.0× 66 2.5× 46 432
A. A. Stefanini Italy 11 304 1.0× 98 0.6× 128 1.0× 45 1.0× 21 0.8× 35 379
M. Pârlog France 10 265 0.9× 107 0.7× 87 0.7× 69 1.6× 18 0.7× 22 333
J. Stroth Germany 12 385 1.3× 143 0.9× 102 0.8× 24 0.5× 27 1.0× 64 437
D. W. Higinbotham United States 13 525 1.7× 57 0.4× 202 1.6× 45 1.0× 16 0.6× 55 595
B. Norum United States 13 303 1.0× 99 0.6× 190 1.5× 43 1.0× 15 0.6× 34 404
C. Bemporad Italy 14 502 1.6× 111 0.7× 110 0.8× 24 0.5× 13 0.5× 39 578
E.V. Hungerford United States 13 451 1.5× 87 0.6× 112 0.9× 29 0.7× 19 0.7× 48 512
R. Coniglione Italy 10 284 0.9× 123 0.8× 89 0.7× 42 1.0× 8 0.3× 43 347
O. V. Bochkarev Russia 12 364 1.2× 136 0.9× 161 1.2× 87 2.0× 12 0.5× 24 421

Countries citing papers authored by B. Jacquot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Jacquot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Jacquot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Jacquot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Jacquot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Jacquot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Jacquot. The network helps show where B. Jacquot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Jacquot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Jacquot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Jacquot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. Jacquot. B. Jacquot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Savajols, H., et al.. (2024). Superconducting multipole triplet field measurements. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2687(7). 72027–72027. 1 indexed citations
2.
Giacomo, Monica Di, et al.. (2024). Upgrade of the medium energy dump geometry for the SPIRAL2 single bunch selector. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2687(8). 82041–82041.
3.
France, G. de, et al.. (2023). Design of a high power solid target for 211At. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 285. 7001–7001.
4.
Kokalova, Tz., M. Freer, C. Wheldon, et al.. (2021). The identification of $${{\varvec{\alpha }}}$$-clustered doorway states in $$^{44,48,52}$$Ti using machine learning. The European Physical Journal A. 57(3). 7 indexed citations
5.
Kokalova, Tz., M. Freer, C. Wheldon, et al.. (2019). Extracting the spectral signature of α clustering in Ti44,48,52 using a continuous wavelet transform. Physical review. C. 100(5). 12 indexed citations
6.
Biswas, S., M. Rejmund, A. Navin, et al.. (2017). The impact of the intruder orbitals on the structure of neutron-rich Ag isotopes. Physics Letters B. 772. 403–408. 7 indexed citations
7.
Navin, A., M. Rejmund, C. Schmitt, et al.. (2013). Towards the high spin–isospin frontier using isotopically-identified fission fragments. Physics Letters B. 728. 136–140. 20 indexed citations
8.
Brown, K. W., S. Hudan, R. T. de Souza, et al.. (2012). Near- and sub-barrier fusion of20O incident ions with12C target nuclei. Physical Review C. 85(2). 16 indexed citations
9.
Rejmund, M., A. Navin, C. Schmitt, et al.. (2011). Performance of the improved larger acceptance spectrometer: VAMOS++. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 646(1). 184–191. 47 indexed citations
10.
Schmitt, C., M. Rejmund, A. Navin, et al.. (2010). New gas-filled mode of the large-acceptance spectrometer VAMOS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 621(1-3). 558–565. 9 indexed citations
11.
Barlini, S., R. Bougault, O. Lopez, et al.. (2009). New digital techniques applied to A and Z identification using pulse shape discrimination of silicon detector current signals. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 600(3). 644–650. 24 indexed citations
12.
Lemasson, A., A. Shrivastava, A. Navin, et al.. (2009). Modern Rutherford Experiment: Tunneling of the Most Neutron-Rich Nucleus. Physical Review Letters. 103(23). 232701–232701. 73 indexed citations
13.
Drouart, A., B. Erdélyi, B. Jacquot, et al.. (2008). Design study of a pre-separator for the LINAG super separator spectrometer. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 266(19-20). 4162–4166. 8 indexed citations
14.
Gómez-Hornillos, M.B., M. Chartier, W. Mittig, et al.. (2005). Mass measurements with the CIME cyclotron at GANIL. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 31(10). S1869–S1872. 1 indexed citations
15.
Jacquot, B., M. Colonna, S. Ayık, & Ph. Chomaz. (1997). RPA instabilities in finite nuclei at low density. Nuclear Physics A. 617(3). 356–367. 12 indexed citations
16.
Jacquot, B., A. Guarnera, Ph. Chomaz, & M. Colonna. (1996). Regularity and chaos in Vlasov evolution of nuclear matter. Physical Review C. 54(6). 3025–3034. 7 indexed citations
17.
Chomaz, Ph., M. Colonna, A. Guarnera, & B. Jacquot. (1995). Fluctuations and instabilities in multifragmentation. Nuclear Physics A. 583. 305–315. 9 indexed citations
18.
Colonna, M., Ph. Chomaz, A. Guarnera, & B. Jacquot. (1995). Spinodal instabilities in expanding Fermi liquids. Physical Review C. 51(5). 2671–2680. 11 indexed citations
19.
Jacquot, B., M. Colonna, Ph. Chomaz, & A. Guarnera. (1995). Comment on the presence of chaos in mean field dynamics inside the spinodal region. Physics Letters B. 359(3-4). 268–272. 7 indexed citations
20.
Melin, G., P. Briand, M. Delaunay, et al.. (1989). THE GRENOBLE ECRIS STATUS. Le Journal de Physique Colloques. 50(C1). C1–673. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026