Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars
20081.5k citationsB. Gustafsson, B. Edvardsson et al.profile →
A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars I. Methods and general properties
2008942 citationsB. Gustafsson, B. Edvardsson et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Gustafsson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Gustafsson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Gustafsson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Gustafsson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Gustafsson. The network helps show where B. Gustafsson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Gustafsson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Gustafsson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Gustafsson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Gustafsson. B. Gustafsson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gustafsson, B., et al.. (2003). A Grid of Model Atmospheres for Cool Stars. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 288. 331–334.7 indexed citations
10.
Gustafsson, B., et al.. (2002). A new MARCS Grid. 210.
Decin, L., Christoffel Waelkens, Kimmo Eriksson, et al.. (2000). Synthetic spectra of cool stars observed with the ISO Short-Wavelength Spectrometer: improving the models and the calibration of the instrument. PhDT. 55.4 indexed citations
13.
Ryde, N., Kimmo Eriksson, B. Gustafsson, H. Olofsson, & B. Plez. (1998). Modelling of molecular bands of oxygen-rich AGB stars. 191. 118.1 indexed citations
14.
Gustafsson, B. & M. Asplund. (1996). Model atmospheres of cool hydrogen-deficient carbon stars. ASPC. 96. 27.1 indexed citations
15.
Edvardsson, B., J. Andersen, B. Gustafsson, et al.. (1993). The chemical evolution of the galactic disk II. Observational data.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 102(3). 603–605.2 indexed citations
16.
Bliek, N. S. van der, P. Bouchet, H. J. Habing, et al.. (1992). Standard stars for the Infrared Space Observatory, ISO.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).3 indexed citations
17.
Olofsson, H., Kimmo Eriksson, & B. Gustafsson. (1989). A comparison of photospheric and circumstellar (HCN)/(CO)-ratios for bright carbon stars. STIN. 230(2). 22477–411.5 indexed citations
18.
Gustafsson, B.. (1983). Atmospheres of Late-type Stars. 60. 139.
19.
Bell, R. A. & B. Gustafsson. (1978). The Colours of G and K Type Giant Stars, II.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 34. 229.
20.
Bell, R. A., Kimmo Eriksson, B. Gustafsson, & Åke Nordlund. (1976). Grid of model atmospheres for metal-deficient giant stars. II. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 23. 37–95.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.