B. Coid
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 2
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 1
-
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 2
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 2
- Child Abuse and Trauma 1
- Co-authors
- Shôn Lewis (2 shared papers)Irving I. Gottesman (1 shared paper)Nadia Davies (1 shared paper)Lisa Jones (1 shared paper)Robin Murray (1 shared paper)Piero Venturi (1 shared paper)Peter McGuffin (1 shared paper)Alison M. Macdonald (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health (2 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Journal of Forensic Psychiatry (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomJapanItaly
In The Last Decade
B. Coid
5 papers receiving 642 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Biological Psychiatry 47
- Psychiatry and Mental health 278
- Clinical Psychology 201
- Genetics 256
- Cognitive Neuroscience 120
Countries citing papers authored by B. Coid
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Coid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Coid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Coid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by B. Coid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Coid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Coid. The network helps show where B. Coid may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside B. Coid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heritability estimates for psychotic disorders: the Maudsley twin psychosis series. Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 569 |
| 2 | 1993 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 39 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 22 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 6 |
About B. Coid
B. Coid is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Genetics, having authored 5 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (1 paper), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (47 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (278 citations), Clinical Psychology (201 citations), Genetics (256 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (120 citations). B. Coid has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Shôn Lewis, Irving I. Gottesman, Nadia Davies, Lisa Jones, Robin Murray, Piero Venturi, Peter McGuffin, Alison M. Macdonald, T. Ribchester and Pak C. Sham. Their work appears in journals such as Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.