Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Studies of the Virgo Cluster. II - A catalog of 2096 galaxies in the Virgo Cluster area. V - Luminosity functions of Virgo Cluster galaxies
1985522 citationsB. Binggeli, Allan Sandage et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Binggeli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Binggeli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Binggeli more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Binggeli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Binggeli. The network helps show where B. Binggeli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Binggeli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Binggeli.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Binggeli based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Binggeli. B. Binggeli is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jerjen, Helmut & B. Binggeli. (2005). Near-field cosmology with dwarf elliptical galaxies : proceedings of the 198th colloquium of the International Astronomical Union held in Les Diablerets, Switzerland, March 14-18, 2005. Cambridge University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
Binggeli, B.. (1994). A Note on the Definition and Nomenclature of Dwarf Galaxies. European Southern Observatory Conference and Workshop Proceedings. 49. 13.1 indexed citations
12.
Binggeli, B., et al.. (1993). Dwarf galaxies in the Virgo cluster. II. Photometric techniques and basic data.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 98(2). 297–326.2 indexed citations
13.
Binggeli, B., C. C. Popescu, & G. Tammann. (1993). The kinematics of the Virgo cluster revisited.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 98(2). 275–296.4 indexed citations
14.
Binggeli, B., G. Meylan, & Ph. Prugniel. (1993). ESO/OHP Workshop on Dwarf Galaxies. Msngr. 74. 36–36.42 indexed citations
15.
Tammann, G., B. Binggeli, M. Capaccioli, et al.. (1991). The distance of the Centaurus group - a test for various distance indicators.. Msngr. 63. 8–10.1 indexed citations
16.
Richter, O. G. & B. Binggeli. (1985). ESO Workshop on the Virgo Cluster of Galaxies, Garching, 4-7 September 1984 : proceedings. 20.19 indexed citations
17.
Binggeli, B.. (1982). The shape and orientation of clusters of galaxies.. A&A. 107. 338–349.6 indexed citations
18.
Binggeli, B.. (1980). On the intrinsic shape of elliptical galaxies. A&A. 82(3). 289–294.1 indexed citations
19.
Binggeli, B., et al.. (1979). A catalogue of galactic star clusters observed in three colours. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 35. 241.3 indexed citations
20.
Binggeli, B., et al.. (1977). The determination of distance, absorption, probable physical members and age for the open clusters Stock 16, Basel 18, Basel 19, Cr 272 and NGC 5168.. 30. 307–313.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.