B. Bhakta

2.4k citations
37 papers · 1.8k · h-index 19

Impact in

    • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Neurology top 1%
    • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
    • Neurological disorders and treatments

Papers in

    • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 15
    • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 13

B. Bhakta

35 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

B. Bhakta
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Rehabilitation 568
  • Neurology 662
  • Ophthalmology 200
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 213
  • Rheumatology 154
Replace Tooru Inoue with:
Tooru Inoue Japan
B Ashworth United Kingdom
Bipin Bhakta United Kingdom
Aase Wagner Denmark
Claudia Celletti Italy
Frank Spaans Netherlands
J.-P. Guichard France
Juhani Ruutiainen Finland
Klaus Gröschel Germany
John H. Pula United States
B. Bhakta relative to Tooru Inoue Japan Tooru Inoue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Tooru Inoue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. Bhakta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Bhakta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Bhakta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Bhakta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Bhakta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Bhakta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Bhakta. The network helps show where B. Bhakta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside B. Bhakta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. Bhakta Line = papers co-authored together B. Bhakta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000253
2 1999218
3 2009197
4 2011184
5 2003157
6 1996153
7 200088
8 201053
9 200850
10 201147
11 200337
12 200536
13 200729
14 201428
15 201226
16 199726
17 199725
18 200324
19 200722
20 201118

About B. Bhakta

B. Bhakta is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, Ophthalmology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (15 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (13 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (7 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (568 citations), Neurology (662 citations), Ophthalmology (200 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (213 citations) and Rheumatology (154 citations). B. Bhakta has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Rory J O’Connor, M A Chamberlain, Martin Levesley, Vera Neumann, Kate Sansam, J. A. Cozens, Sophie Makower, John Bamford, Paul Brennan and Manoj Sivan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Lara D. Veeken, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, British Medical Bulletin and Robotica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact