A.-W. Chan
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 6
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 0.2%
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Health and Medical Studies 1
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.5%
-
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation 2
- Ethics in Clinical Research 1
-
- Delphi Technique in Research 2
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 2
-
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 1
- Co-authors
- Douglas G. AltmanDavid MoherMary Dixon‐WoodsPaul GlasziouRuairidh MilneRafael PereraTammy HoffmannSarah E Lamb
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
A.-W. Chan
10 papers receiving 11.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.0k
- Applied Psychology 627
- Rehabilitation 788
- General Health Professions 2.6k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 390
Countries citing papers authored by A.-W. Chan
This map shows the geographic impact of A.-W. Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.-W. Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.-W. Chan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A.-W. Chan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.-W. Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.-W. Chan. The network helps show where A.-W. Chan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.-W. Chan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 113 | |
| 4 | Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guidebreakdown → | 2014 | 6536 |
| 5 | SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trialsbreakdown → | 2013 | 3554 |
| 6 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 347 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 135 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 316 | |
| 10 | 1985 | 27 |
About A.-W. Chan
A.-W. Chan is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Statistics and Probability, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 11.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Health and Medical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.0k citations), Applied Psychology (627 citations), Rehabilitation (788 citations), General Health Professions (2.6k citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (390 citations). A.-W. Chan has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Douglas G. Altman, David Moher, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Paul Glasziou, Ruairidh Milne, Rafael Perera, Tammy Hoffmann, Sarah E Lamb, Virginia Barbour and Susan Michie. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Virology, Das Gesundheitswesen and Hong Kong Medical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.