Aurélie Brunie

1.1k total citations
29 papers, 674 citations indexed

About

Aurélie Brunie is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Aurélie Brunie has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 674 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 11 papers in General Health Professions and 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Aurélie Brunie's work include Global Maternal and Child Health (16 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (10 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (7 papers). Aurélie Brunie is often cited by papers focused on Global Maternal and Child Health (16 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (10 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (7 papers). Aurélie Brunie collaborates with scholars based in United States, Nigeria and Uganda. Aurélie Brunie's co-authors include Mario Chen, Rebecca L. Callahan, Steven P. Schwendeman, Song Li, Jie Tang, Richard N. Terry, Wei Li, Richard K. Noel, Mark R. Prausnitz and Leonard Bufumbo and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Science Advances.

In The Last Decade

Aurélie Brunie

28 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Aurélie Brunie United States 12 254 189 183 170 89 29 674
Cathy Green United Kingdom 15 228 0.9× 108 0.6× 49 0.3× 3 0.0× 276 3.1× 42 763
Lakshmi Krishnan United States 7 53 0.2× 33 0.2× 44 0.2× 14 0.1× 2 0.0× 20 426
Katherine Marshall United States 18 23 0.1× 141 0.7× 31 0.2× 4 0.0× 143 1.6× 93 1.0k
Brooke Johnson United States 17 1.0k 4.0× 442 2.3× 1.2k 6.6× 6 0.0× 4 0.0× 35 1.6k
Peter Razzell United Kingdom 13 31 0.1× 104 0.6× 42 0.2× 2 0.0× 8 0.1× 30 595
Dorothy Porter United Kingdom 15 28 0.1× 209 1.1× 85 0.5× 9 0.1× 41 784
Randall K. Thomas United States 15 14 0.1× 90 0.5× 133 0.7× 3 0.0× 19 0.2× 26 680
Katherine Watson United Kingdom 12 50 0.2× 104 0.6× 33 0.2× 3 0.0× 32 370
Elizabeth Nyothach United Kingdom 16 81 0.3× 390 2.1× 742 4.1× 4 0.0× 33 1.1k
Barkat‐e‐Khuda Bangladesh 13 268 1.1× 149 0.8× 96 0.5× 49 514

Countries citing papers authored by Aurélie Brunie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aurélie Brunie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aurélie Brunie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aurélie Brunie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aurélie Brunie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aurélie Brunie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aurélie Brunie. The network helps show where Aurélie Brunie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aurélie Brunie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aurélie Brunie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aurélie Brunie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aurélie Brunie. Aurélie Brunie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brunie, Aurélie, et al.. (2022). Making Removals Part of Informed Choice: A Mixed-Method Study of Client Experiences With Removal of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Senegal. Global Health Science and Practice. 10(5). e2200123–e2200123. 7 indexed citations
3.
Callahan, Rebecca L., et al.. (2021). Optimizing the design of a contraceptive microarray patch: a discrete choice experiment on women’s preferences in India and Nigeria. Reproductive Health. 18(1). 67–67. 10 indexed citations
4.
Brunie, Aurélie, et al.. (2021). Factors affecting uptake of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: A mixed-method study of social franchise clients in Nigeria. PLoS ONE. 16(9). e0257769–e0257769. 3 indexed citations
5.
Cartwright, Alice F., et al.. (2020). What About Methods for Men? A Qualitative Analysis of Attitudes Toward Male Contraception in Burkina Faso and Uganda. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 46. 153–153. 6 indexed citations
6.
Mackenzie, Amelia C. L., Siân Curtis, Rebecca L. Callahan, et al.. (2020). Women's Perspectives on Contraceptive-Induced Amenorrhea in Burkina Faso and Uganda. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 46. 247–247. 4 indexed citations
7.
Callahan, Rebecca L., et al.. (2020). What Goes In Must Come Out: A Mixed-Method Study of Access to Contraceptive Implant Removal Services in Ghana. Global Health Science and Practice. 8(2). 220–238. 20 indexed citations
8.
Li, Wei, Jie Tang, Richard N. Terry, et al.. (2019). Long-acting reversible contraception by effervescent microneedle patch. Science Advances. 5(11). eaaw8145–eaaw8145. 193 indexed citations
9.
Callahan, Rebecca L., Aurélie Brunie, Amelia C. L. Mackenzie, et al.. (2019). Potential user interest in new long-acting contraceptives: Results from a mixed methods study in Burkina Faso and Uganda. PLoS ONE. 14(5). e0217333–e0217333. 28 indexed citations
10.
Brunie, Aurélie. (2019). Household disaster preparedness: assessing the importance of relational and community social capital. Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). 3 indexed citations
11.
Brunie, Aurélie, et al.. (2018). Expanding Understanding of Community Health Worker Programs: A Cross-Sectional Survey on the Work, Satisfaction, and Livelihoods of CHWs in Madagascar. INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing. 55. 1141351325–1141351325. 12 indexed citations
13.
Brunie, Aurélie, et al.. (2017). Integrating Family Planning and HIV Services at the Community Level: Formative Assessment with Village Health Teams in Uganda. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 21(2). 73–80. 9 indexed citations
14.
Brunie, Aurélie, et al.. (2016). Qualitative Assessment of the Application of a Discrete Choice Experiment With Community Health Workers in Uganda: Aligning Incentives With Preferences. Global Health Science and Practice. 4(4). 684–693. 8 indexed citations
16.
Hoke, Theresa, et al.. (2012). Community-Based Distribution of Injectable Contraceptives: Introduction Strategies in Four Sub-Saharan African Countries. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 38(4). 214–219. 27 indexed citations
17.
Brunie, Aurélie, et al.. (2011). Community-based distribution of injectable contraceptives in an African setting: Community trial in Madagascar. PubMed. 21(1). 21–26. 6 indexed citations
18.
Brunie, Aurélie, et al.. (2011). Scaling Up Community Provision of Injectables through the Public Sector in Uganda. Studies in Family Planning. 42(2). 117–124. 18 indexed citations
19.
Brunie, Aurélie. (2010). Household Awareness of What to Do in a Disaster: A Social Capital Approach. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters. 28(1). 59–86. 5 indexed citations
20.
Brunie, Aurélie. (2009). Meaningful distinctions within a concept: Relational, collective, and generalized social capital. Social Science Research. 38(2). 251–265. 89 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026