Asit K. Chakraborti
- Organic Chemistry top 0.1%
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 87
- Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles 41
- Synthesis and biological activity 40
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques 38
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 15
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 0.5%
- Catalysis top 2%
- Pharmaceutical Science top 0.5%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 1%
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 20
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 31
-
- Caching and Content Delivery 17
Asit K. Chakraborti
224 papers receiving 10.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Organic Chemistry 7.7k
- Process Chemistry and Technology 476
- Catalysis 529
- Pharmaceutical Science 447
- Inorganic Chemistry 903
Countries citing papers authored by Asit K. Chakraborti
This map shows the geographic impact of Asit K. Chakraborti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Asit K. Chakraborti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asit K. Chakraborti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Asit K. Chakraborti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Asit K. Chakraborti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Asit K. Chakraborti. The network helps show where Asit K. Chakraborti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Asit K. Chakraborti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 52 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 12 | Information-centric networking based homenet | 2013 | 29 |
| 13 | 2009 | 106 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 43 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 47 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 160 |
About Asit K. Chakraborti
Asit K. Chakraborti is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology, Toxicology, Inorganic Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 230 papers that have together received 10.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (87 papers), Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles (41 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (40 papers), Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (38 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (31 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (20 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (17 papers) and Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (7.7k citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (476 citations), Catalysis (529 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (447 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (903 citations). Asit K. Chakraborti has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rajesh Gulhane, Srikant Bhagat, Raj Kumar, Sudipta Raha Roy, Sunay V. Chankeshwara, Dinesh Kumar, Santosh Rudrawar, Ramasamy Thilagavathi, Atul Kondaskar and Shivani. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Tetrahedron Letters, Synthesis, Tetrahedron and Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.