Ashley E. Ermer

562 citations
26 papers · 358 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Ashley E. Ermer

21 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Ashley E. Ermer
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 56
  • Health 184
  • Demography 96
  • Social Psychology 153
  • Clinical Psychology 83
Replace Nancy J. M. Henry with:
Nancy J. M. Henry United States
Marina Schmitt Brazil
Maja Wiest Germany
Donald G Barstow United States
Rosa Novo Portugal
Chaoxin Jiang China
Yochai Shavit United States
Sara A. Smock United States
Liora Bar-Tur Israel
Maríagiovanna Caprara Spain
Ashley E. Ermer relative to Nancy J. M. Henry United States Nancy J. M. Henry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Nancy J. M. Henry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ashley E. Ermer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ashley E. Ermer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ashley E. Ermer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ashley E. Ermer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ashley E. Ermer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ashley E. Ermer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ashley E. Ermer. The network helps show where Ashley E. Ermer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ashley E. Ermer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ashley E. Ermer Line = papers co-authored together Ashley E. Ermer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201777
2 201777
3 201833
4 201929
5 201523
6 202018
7 202218
8 201716
9 202013
10 202111
11 20209
12 20209
13 20215
14 20204
15 20203
16 20223
17 20233
18 20232
19 20202
20 20212

About Ashley E. Ermer

Ashley E. Ermer is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Demography, having authored 26 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (11 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (9 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (7 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (5 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (3 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (56 citations), Health (184 citations), Demography (96 citations), Social Psychology (153 citations) and Clinical Psychology (83 citations). Ashley E. Ermer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christine M. Proulx, Jeremy B. Kanter, Angela L. Curl, Dikla Segel‐Karpas, Jacquelyn Benson, Marilyn Coleman, Lawrence H.Ganong, Josh R. Novak, Stephanie J. Wilson and James M. Harper. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Family Theory & Review, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Aging & Mental Health, Research on Aging and The Journals of Gerontology Series B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact