Ashley E. Ermer

582 citations
27 papers · 381 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ashley E. Ermer

22 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

Ashley E. Ermer
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 33
  • Health 138
  • Demography 88
  • Social Psychology 142
  • Clinical Psychology 67
Replace Bert Hayslip with:
Bert Hayslip United States
Heather R. Fuller-Iglesias United States
Georg Henning Germany
Marina Schmitt Brazil
Maja Wiest Germany
S.S. Borys Canada
Charles L. Cole United Kingdom
Sagrario Yárnoz-Yaben Spain
Maríagiovanna Caprara Spain
Anastasia Zissi Greece
Ashley E. Ermer relative to Bert Hayslip United States Bert Hayslip's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.4×
Bert Hayslip · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ashley E. Ermer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ashley E. Ermer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ashley E. Ermer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ashley E. Ermer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ashley E. Ermer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ashley E. Ermer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ashley E. Ermer. The network helps show where Ashley E. Ermer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ashley E. Ermer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ashley E. Ermer Line = papers co-authored together Ashley E. Ermer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201778
2 201778
3 201836
4 201930
5 202224
6 201524
7 202019
8 201716
9 202114
10 202014
11 202010
12 20209
13 20215
14 20205
15 20234
16 20233
17 20203
18 20223
19 20212
20 20202

About Ashley E. Ermer

Ashley E. Ermer is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Demography and Clinical Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (9 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (8 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (3 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (33 citations), Health (138 citations), Demography (88 citations), Social Psychology (142 citations) and Clinical Psychology (67 citations). Ashley E. Ermer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christine M. Proulx, Jeremy B. Kanter, Angela L. Curl, Dikla Segel‐Karpas, Lawrence H.Ganong, Marilyn Coleman, Jacquelyn Benson, James M. Harper, Josh R. Novak and Stephanie J. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Family Theory & Review, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Aging & Mental Health, Research in Human Development and Research on Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact