Asem Shadid

31 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Asem Shadid
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 6
  • General Health Professions 68
  • Dermatology 24
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Family Practice 3
Replace Sukhbir Singh Chopra with:
Sukhbir Singh Chopra India
Sarah Stanley United States
Natasha Johnson Canada
Stéphanie C. Boyer Canada
Francisco José Barbosa‐Camacho Mexico
Nóra Arató United States
Thomas McIntyre United States
Stella Vig United Kingdom
Puneet S. Braich United States
Claire Nollett United Kingdom
Asem Shadid relative to Sukhbir Singh Chopra India Sukhbir Singh Chopra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sukhbir Singh Chopra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Asem Shadid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Asem Shadid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Asem Shadid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asem Shadid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Asem Shadid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Asem Shadid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Asem Shadid. The network helps show where Asem Shadid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Asem Shadid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Asem Shadid Line = papers co-authored together Asem Shadid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202087
2 202029
3 201913
4 202211
5 202011
6 20209
7 20198
8 20197
9 20207
10
Factors affecting the choice of dermatology as a specialty by medical students: Data from 28 KSA medical schools.
20227
11 20217
12 20246
13 20176
14 20206
15 20235
16 20235
17 20234
18 20224
19 20223
20 20243

About Asem Shadid

Asem Shadid is a scholar working on Dermatology, Epidemiology, Surgery, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 44 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (5 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (5 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (4 papers), Medicine and Dermatology Studies History (4 papers), Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (3 papers), Hair Growth and Disorders (3 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (3 papers) and Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (6 citations), General Health Professions (68 citations), Dermatology (24 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and Family Practice (3 citations). Asem Shadid has collaborated with scholars based in Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh and United States. Frequent co-authors include Salah-Ud-Din Khan, Essam A. Osman, Khalid A. Bin Abdulrahman, Abdullah Alghamdi, Rajiv Khandekar, Waleed Al-Rashed, Nahla Azzam, Tariq Al‐Zaid, F. Cambazard and Jean Perrot. Their work appears in journals such as Skin Research and Technology, Clinical Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, Dermatology Research and Practice, BMC Medical Education and Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact