Arthur Loveridge
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Genetics
- Ecology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ernest E. WilliamsWalter RoseThomas BarbourC.J. KennedyJohn E. ElliottC. W. BensonChristine A. BishopW.R.P. Bourne
- Topics
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology (8 papers)Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (5 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers)
- Journals
- Biological ConservationCopeiaIbis
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Arthur Loveridge
21 papers receiving 366 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Global and Planetary Change 254
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 224
- Genetics 114
- Ecology 110
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 108
Countries citing papers authored by Arthur Loveridge
This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur Loveridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur Loveridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur Loveridge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur Loveridge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur Loveridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur Loveridge. The network helps show where Arthur Loveridge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arthur Loveridge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arthur Loveridge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arthur Loveridge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arthur Loveridge. Arthur Loveridge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Comparative Study of the Herpetological Faunae of the Uluguru and Usambara Mountains, Tanganyika Territory With Descriptions of New Species | 10 |
| 2 | The performance of African protected areas for lions and their prey, determinants of success and key conservation threats | 3 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 215 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Leopards in the night | 1 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 59 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Arthur Loveridge
Arthur Loveridge is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (8 papers), Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (5 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (84 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (224 citations) and Paleontology (91 citations). Arthur Loveridge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Ernest E. Williams, Walter Rose, Thomas Barbour, C.J. Kennedy, John E. Elliott, C. W. Benson, Christine A. Bishop, W.R.P. Bourne, Kenneth Uiseb and Luke Hunter. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Copeia and Ibis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.