Amy E. Hinks

1.4k total citations
17 papers, 996 citations indexed

About

Amy E. Hinks is a scholar working on Ecology, Social Psychology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy E. Hinks has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 996 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Ecology, 9 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Amy E. Hinks's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (5 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (5 papers). Amy E. Hinks is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (5 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (5 papers). Amy E. Hinks collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Amy E. Hinks's co-authors include David W. Macdonald, Dawn Burnham, Amy Dickman, Ewan A. Macdonald, Ella F. Cole, John L. Quinn, Julie Morand‐Ferron, Ben C. Sheldon, Yadvinder Malhi and Teddy A. Wilkin and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Biology, The American Naturalist and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Amy E. Hinks

17 papers receiving 986 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amy E. Hinks United Kingdom	13	631	318	260	201	169	17	996
Eduardo J. Naranjo Mexico	19	932 1.5×	230 0.7×	360 1.4×	258 1.3×	197 1.2×	86	1.3k
Robert Kityo Uganda	13	360 0.6×	252 0.8×	268 1.0×	115 0.6×	199 1.2×	36	1.0k
Spartaco Gippoliti Italy	20	727 1.2×	234 0.7×	235 0.9×	328 1.6×	132 0.8×	87	1.1k
Axel Moehrenschlager Canada	18	671 1.1×	179 0.6×	115 0.4×	191 1.0×	196 1.2×	67	1.0k
Rafael Reyna‐Hurtado Mexico	19	772 1.2×	186 0.6×	335 1.3×	174 0.9×	190 1.1×	66	1.1k
Karen Phillipps	9	729 1.2×	345 1.1×	132 0.5×	205 1.0×	124 0.7×	10	1.2k
Mark Bowler United Kingdom	17	498 0.8×	210 0.7×	476 1.8×	101 0.5×	114 0.7×	54	912
Lauren A. Harrington United Kingdom	21	936 1.5×	196 0.6×	184 0.7×	167 0.8×	89 0.5×	57	1.3k
Bruno Lourtet France	17	961 1.5×	306 1.0×	82 0.3×	72 0.4×	131 0.8×	26	1.1k
Honnavalli N. Kumara India	19	727 1.2×	409 1.3×	589 2.3×	122 0.6×	220 1.3×	115	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Hinks

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Hinks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Hinks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Hinks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Hinks

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Hinks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Hinks. The network helps show where Amy E. Hinks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy E. Hinks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy E. Hinks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy E. Hinks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy E. Hinks. Amy E. Hinks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Macdonald, David W., Paul J. Johnson, Dawn Burnham, et al.. (2022). Understanding nuanced preferences for carnivore conservation: To know them is not always to love them. Global Ecology and Conservation. 37. e02150–e02150. 10 indexed citations

Kuiper, Timothy, Amy Dickman, Amy E. Hinks, et al.. (2018). Combining biological and socio‐political criteria to set spatial conservation priorities for the endangered African wild dog. Animal Conservation. 21(5). 376–386. 9 indexed citations

Sandom, Christopher J., Søren Faurby, Jens‐Christian Svenning, et al.. (2017). Learning from the past to prepare for the future: felids face continued threat from declining prey. Ecography. 41(1). 140–152. 28 indexed citations

Sandom, Christopher J., James P. Williams, Dawn Burnham, et al.. (2017). Deconstructed cat communities: Quantifying the threat to felids from prey defaunation. Diversity and Distributions. 23(6). 667–679. 20 indexed citations

Trouwborst, Arie, Dawn Burnham, Amy Dickman, et al.. (2017). International law and lions (Panthera leo): understanding and improving the contribution of wildlife treaties to the conservation and sustainable use of an iconic carnivore. Nature Conservation. 21. 83–128. 14 indexed citations

Lindsey, Peter A., Lisanne S. Petracca, Paul J. Funston, et al.. (2017). The performance of African protected areas for lions and their prey. Biological Conservation. 209. 137–149. 117 indexed citations

Macdonald, Ewan A., Amy E. Hinks, David J. Weiss, et al.. (2017). Identifying ambassador species for conservation marketing. Global Ecology and Conservation. 12. 204–214. 67 indexed citations

Lindsey, Peter A., Guillaume Chapron, Lisanne S. Petracca, et al.. (2017). Relative efforts of countries to conserve world’s megafauna. Global Ecology and Conservation. 10. 243–252. 64 indexed citations

Hinks, Amy E., Arthur Loveridge, D. W. Macdonald, et al.. (2016). The performance of African protected areas for lions and their prey, determinants of success and key conservation threats. Biological Conservation. 3 indexed citations

10.

Hinks, Amy E., et al.. (2015). Scale-Dependent Phenological Synchrony between Songbirds and Their Caterpillar Food Source. The American Naturalist. 186(1). 84–97. 66 indexed citations

11.

Dickman, Amy, Amy E. Hinks, Ewan A. Macdonald, Dawn Burnham, & David W. Macdonald. (2015). Priorities for global felid conservation. Conservation Biology. 29(3). 854–864. 68 indexed citations

12.

Macdonald, Ewan A., Dawn Burnham, Amy E. Hinks, et al.. (2015). Conservation inequality and the charismatic cat: Felis felicis. Global Ecology and Conservation. 3. 851–866. 172 indexed citations

13.

Burnham, Dawn, Amy E. Hinks, & David W. Macdonald. (2013). Life and Dinner under the Shared Umbrella: Patterns in Felid and Primate Communities. Folia Primatologica. 83(3-6). 148–170. 11 indexed citations

14.

Macdonald, David W., Dawn Burnham, Amy E. Hinks, & Richard W. Wrangham. (2013). A Problem Shared Is a Problem Reduced: Seeking Efficiency in the Conservation of Felids and Primates. Folia Primatologica. 83(3-6). 171–215. 29 indexed citations

15.

Sepil, Irem, Shelly Lachish, Amy E. Hinks, & Ben C. Sheldon. (2013). Mhc supertypes confer both qualitative and quantitative resistance to avian malaria infections in a wild bird population. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 280(1759). 20130134–20130134. 89 indexed citations

16.

Cole, Ella F., Julie Morand‐Ferron, Amy E. Hinks, & John L. Quinn. (2012). Cognitive Ability Influences Reproductive Life History Variation in the Wild. Current Biology. 22(19). 1808–1812. 186 indexed citations

17.

Evans, Simon R., Amy E. Hinks, Teddy A. Wilkin, & Ben C. Sheldon. (2010). Age, sex and beauty: methodological dependence of age- and sex-dichromatism in the great tit Parus major. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 101(4). 777–796. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact