Arthur Canter

1.8k citations
40 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

    • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Toxicology top 2%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Papers in

Arthur Canter

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Arthur Canter
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Pharmacology 512
  • Toxicology 82
  • Clinical Psychology 401
  • Applied Psychology 88
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 261
Replace R. Caccavari with:
R. Caccavari Italy
Joseph T. Sakai United States
I Schmidt United Kingdom
María José Fernández-Serrano Spain
Nancy Lockhart United States
Paul H. Blachly United States
Richard E. Luria United States
Sheila Specker United States
Peter la Cour Denmark
R. Poulton New Zealand
Arthur Canter relative to R. Caccavari Italy R. Caccavari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
R. Caccavari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Arthur Canter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur Canter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur Canter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur Canter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur Canter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur Canter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur Canter. The network helps show where Arthur Canter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Arthur Canter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Arthur Canter Line = papers co-authored together Arthur Canter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975291
2 1975209
3 197495
4 195982
5 196078
6 197567
7 196067
8 197946
9 196643
10 197741
11 197735
12
modified scoring method and replication.
196828
13 196826
14 197424
15 196020
16 196619
17 197219
18 197216
19 196316
20 196315

About Arthur Canter

Arthur Canter is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Pharmacology, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (5 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (512 citations), Toxicology (82 citations), Clinical Psychology (401 citations), Applied Psychology (88 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (261 citations). Arthur Canter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Russell Noyes, S. Fred Brunk, David Avery, C. Y. Kondo, N. J. C. Andreasen, D A Baram, Eugene Meyer, Milton T. Edgerton, John R. Knott and John Neustadt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psychosomatic Medicine, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Comprehensive Psychiatry and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact