Arran Greenop

556 total citations
9 papers, 188 citations indexed

About

Arran Greenop is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Arran Greenop has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 188 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 6 papers in Insect Science and 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Arran Greenop's work include Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers). Arran Greenop is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers). Arran Greenop collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Belgium. Arran Greenop's co-authors include Ben A. Woodcock, Richard F. Pywell, S. M. Cook, Andrew Wilby, Nick J. B. Isaac, Francesca Mancini, Andrew C. Johnson, Rob Cooke, Claire Carvell and Charlotte L. Outhwaite and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Current Biology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Arran Greenop

9 papers receiving 185 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Arran Greenop United Kingdom 7 114 102 64 51 40 9 188
Hana Šefrová Czechia 7 117 1.0× 95 0.9× 56 0.9× 96 1.9× 69 1.7× 26 235
Marina Mazón Spain 7 112 1.0× 88 0.9× 37 0.6× 70 1.4× 32 0.8× 39 195
Fernanda Baena‐Díaz Mexico 8 111 1.0× 64 0.6× 61 1.0× 48 0.9× 59 1.5× 19 202
Sandra Åström Norway 6 112 1.0× 67 0.7× 51 0.8× 20 0.4× 41 1.0× 7 170
Johanna Häussler Germany 5 108 0.9× 44 0.4× 73 1.1× 52 1.0× 36 0.9× 6 171
Petr Pyszko Czechia 10 118 1.0× 90 0.9× 67 1.0× 81 1.6× 63 1.6× 38 228
Dominik Ganser Switzerland 6 187 1.6× 130 1.3× 69 1.1× 49 1.0× 114 2.9× 6 245
Cristina Ganuza Germany 8 119 1.0× 93 0.9× 67 1.0× 60 1.2× 71 1.8× 17 217
Jean‐Paul Haenni Switzerland 8 149 1.3× 67 0.7× 51 0.8× 55 1.1× 42 1.1× 27 196
Samuel Novais Brazil 9 177 1.6× 92 0.9× 89 1.4× 59 1.2× 83 2.1× 28 266

Countries citing papers authored by Arran Greenop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arran Greenop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arran Greenop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arran Greenop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arran Greenop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arran Greenop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arran Greenop. The network helps show where Arran Greenop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arran Greenop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arran Greenop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arran Greenop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arran Greenop. Arran Greenop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Mancini, Francesca, Rob Cooke, Ben A. Woodcock, et al.. (2024). Correction to: ‘Invertebrate biodiversity continues to decline in cropland’ (2023), by Mancini et al.. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 291(2016). 20232650–20232650. 1 indexed citations
2.
Greenop, Arran, Ben A. Woodcock, & Richard F. Pywell. (2023). Using functional traits to predict pollination services: A review. Journal of Pollination Ecology. 35. 194–206. 6 indexed citations
3.
Mancini, Francesca, Rob Cooke, Ben A. Woodcock, et al.. (2023). Invertebrate biodiversity continues to decline in cropland. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 290(2000). 20230897–20230897. 24 indexed citations
4.
Woodcock, Ben A., Anna Oliver, Lindsay K. Newbold, et al.. (2022). Citizen science monitoring reveals links between honeybee health, pesticide exposure and seasonal availability of floral resources. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 14331–14331. 4 indexed citations
5.
Greenop, Arran, Ben A. Woodcock, Charlotte L. Outhwaite, et al.. (2021). Patterns of invertebrate functional diversity highlight the vulnerability of ecosystem services over a 45-year period. Current Biology. 31(20). 4627–4634.e3. 21 indexed citations
6.
Greenop, Arran, S. M. Cook, Andrew Wilby, Richard F. Pywell, & Ben A. Woodcock. (2020). Invertebrate community structure predicts natural pest control resilience to insecticide exposure. Journal of Applied Ecology. 57(12). 2441–2453. 15 indexed citations
7.
Greenop, Arran, et al.. (2020). Equivocal Evidence for Colony Level Stress Effects on Bumble Bee Pollination Services. Insects. 11(3). 191–191. 18 indexed citations
8.
Greenop, Arran, et al.. (2019). Two common invertebrate predators show varying predation responses to different types of sentinel prey. Journal of Applied Entomology. 143(4). 380–386. 11 indexed citations
9.
Greenop, Arran, Ben A. Woodcock, Andrew Wilby, S. M. Cook, & Richard F. Pywell. (2018). Functional diversity positively affects prey suppression by invertebrate predators: a meta‐analysis. Ecology. 99(8). 1771–1782. 88 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026