Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities
2011744 citationsJames M. Bullock, Richard F. Pywell et al.profile →
Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes
2018630 citationsHyun S. Gweon, Jodey Peyton et al.profile →
Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees
2017532 citationsBen A. Woodcock, James M. Bullock et al.Scienceprofile →
Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England
2016370 citationsBen A. Woodcock, James M. Bullock et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard F. Pywell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard F. Pywell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard F. Pywell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard F. Pywell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard F. Pywell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard F. Pywell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard F. Pywell. The network helps show where Richard F. Pywell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard F. Pywell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard F. Pywell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard F. Pywell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard F. Pywell. Richard F. Pywell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Woodcock, Ben A., James M. Bullock, Richard F. Shore, et al.. (2017). Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees. Science. 356(6345). 1393–1395.532 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Woodcock, Ben A., et al.. (2012). Limiting factors in the restoration of grassland insects. CentAUR (University of Reading). 47–51.1 indexed citations
Pywell, Richard F., Ben A. Woodcock, R. J. Orr, et al.. (2010). Options for wide scale enhancement of grassland biodiversity under the Entry Level Scheme. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository). 125–131.5 indexed citations
8.
Warman, E. A., Richard F. Pywell, Kevin J. Walker, & James M. Bullock. (2007). Plug plants survival under different grassland management regimes.. Aspects of applied biology. 109–115.1 indexed citations
9.
Cherrill, Andrew, et al.. (2007). Steps to more effective bracken management.. Aspects of applied biology. 143–155.2 indexed citations
10.
Rotherham, Ian D., N. D. Boatman, D. V. Clay, et al.. (2000). Vegetation succession and colonisation rates at the forest edge under different environmental conditions.. Aspects of applied biology. 1–8.2 indexed citations
11.
Cherrill, Andrew, Colin J. McClean, N. D. Boatman, et al.. (2000). Lack of precision in mapping upland habitats and preliminary conservation assessments.. Aspects of applied biology. 167–172.1 indexed citations
12.
Mountford, J. O., S. J. Manchester, Ruth D. Swetnam, et al.. (2000). Targeting habitat restoration: methods and application to lowland wet grassland.. Aspects of applied biology. 255–262.1 indexed citations
13.
Vogiatzakis, Ioannis Ν., Geoffrey Griffiths, N. D. Boatman, et al.. (2000). Predicting the distribution of plant communities in the Lefka Ori of Crete using GIS.. Aspects of applied biology. 357–362.1 indexed citations
14.
Telfer, Mark G., William R. Meek, Philip W. Lambdon, et al.. (2000). The carabids of conventional and widened field margins.. Aspects of applied biology. 58(58). 411–416.7 indexed citations
15.
Rotherham, Ian D., N. D. Boatman, D. V. Clay, et al.. (2000). The response of bluebell (Hyacinthoides non-scripta) to seasonal differences between years and woodland management.. Aspects of applied biology. 351–356.1 indexed citations
16.
Boatman, N. D., D. V. Clay, Alan H. Goodman, et al.. (2000). Techniques for the control of Molinia caerulea on wet heath after burning.. Aspects of applied biology. 185–190.2 indexed citations
17.
Britton, Andrea J., R. H. Marrs, Peter Carey, et al.. (2000). Management techniques to promote Calluna vulgaris cover on heathland invaded by grasses.. Aspects of applied biology. 173–178.2 indexed citations
18.
Pywell, Richard F., P. D. Putwain, R. H. Marrs, et al.. (2000). Ecological impacts of military vehicles on chalk grassland.. Aspects of applied biology. 293–298.3 indexed citations
19.
Pywell, Richard F., et al.. (1998). Preliminary studies of the effects of pre-emergence herbicides on the establishment of injurious weed and wildflower species. Aspects of applied biology.5 indexed citations
20.
Pywell, Richard F., et al.. (1996). Preliminary studies of the effects of selective herbicides on wild flower species. Aspects of applied biology.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.