Arie Weeren
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Peter Paul De DeynGuy NagelsRishi SheorajpandayMichel J. A. M. van PuttenJacob EngwerdaAnton A. StoorvogelJohannes SchumacherFrederik T. Verleysen
- Topics
- Economic theories and models (7 papers)Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (5 papers)Game Theory and Applications (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Arie Weeren
31 papers receiving 720 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Cognitive Neuroscience 235
- Neurology 119
- Control and Systems Engineering 88
- Epidemiology 79
- Neurology 77
Countries citing papers authored by Arie Weeren
This map shows the geographic impact of Arie Weeren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arie Weeren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arie Weeren more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arie Weeren
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arie Weeren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arie Weeren. The network helps show where Arie Weeren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arie Weeren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arie Weeren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arie Weeren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arie Weeren. Arie Weeren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 105 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 118 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 89 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | Monetary and Fiscal Policy Design under EMU: A Dynamic Game Approach | 4 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | On the solutions of the algebraic Riccati equation corresponding to the open-loop Nash equilibrium in LQ-games | 2 |
| 18 | Asymptotic analysis of Nash equilibria in nonzero-sum linear-quadratic differential games: The two player case | 2 |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | The discrete-time Riccati equation related to the H00 control problem | 2 |
About Arie Weeren
Arie Weeren is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 734 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (7 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (5 papers) and Game Theory and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (59 citations), Neurology (119 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (235 citations). Arie Weeren has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Paul De Deyn, Guy Nagels, Rishi Sheorajpanday, Michel J. A. M. van Putten, Jacob Engwerda, Anton A. Stoorvogel, Johannes Schumacher, Frederik T. Verleysen, Jean‐Pierre Timmermans and Samir Kumar‐Singh. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Automatica and Brain Behavior and Immunity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.