Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Pierre PluyeQuan Nha HongBogdan DanalacheNicolas NoiseuxJolanta GutkowskaMarek JankowskiÉric PlanteAhmed Ménaouar
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers)Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes
9 papers receiving 715 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- General Health Professions 232
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 170
- Clinical Psychology 124
- Social Psychology 88
- Sociology and Political Science 71
Countries citing papers authored by Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes
This map shows the geographic impact of Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes. The network helps show where Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes. Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the | 638 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 56 | |
| 11 | 13 |
About Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes
Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Geriatrics and Gerontology and General Health Professions, having authored 11 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (10 citations), General Health Professions (232 citations) and Health Informatics (8 citations). Araceli Gonzalez‐Reyes has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Chile and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Pluye, Quan Nha Hong, Bogdan Danalache, Nicolas Noiseux, Jolanta Gutkowska, Marek Jankowski, Éric Plante, Ahmed Ménaouar, Pierre Pluye and Roland Grad. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology and Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.