Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs
20022.0k citationsAntony W. Rix, John G. Beerends et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Antony W. Rix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antony W. Rix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antony W. Rix more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antony W. Rix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antony W. Rix. The network helps show where Antony W. Rix may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antony W. Rix
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antony W. Rix.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antony W. Rix based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Antony W. Rix. Antony W. Rix is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Beerends, John G., A.P. Hekstra, Antony W. Rix, & Michael P. Hollier. (2002). Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ) The New ITU Standard for End-to-End Speech Quality Assessment Part II: Psychoacoustic Model. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 50(10). 765–778.151 indexed citations
6.
Rix, Antony W., Michael P. Hollier, A.P. Hekstra, & John G. Beerends. (2002). Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) the new ITU standard for end-to-end speech quality assessment: Part I: Time-delay compensation. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 50(10). 755–764.130 indexed citations
7.
Rix, Antony W., John G. Beerends, M. P. Hollier, & A.P. Hekstra. (2002). Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs. 2. 749–752.1995 indexed citations breakdown →
Rix, Antony W.. (2001). Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ)-A new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 2. 749–752.32 indexed citations
Rix, Antony W., Michael P. Hollier, John G. Beerends, & A.P. Hekstra. (2000). PESQ-The New ITU Standard for End-to-End Speech Quality Assessment. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.22 indexed citations
12.
Rix, Antony W., et al.. (1999). Perceptual Measurement of End-to-End Speech Quality Over Audio and Packet-Based Networks. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.10 indexed citations
13.
Rix, Antony W. & M. P. Hollier. (1999). Perceptual SpeechQuality Assessment from Narrowband Telephony to Wideband Audio. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.1 indexed citations
14.
Rix, Antony W., et al.. (1999). Models of Human Perception. BT Technology Journal. 17(1). 24–34.29 indexed citations
15.
Rix, Antony W.. (1999). Advances in objective quality assessment of speech over analogue and packet based networks.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.