Antonio J. del‐Ama
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 26
-
- Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention 12
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
-
- Spinal Cord Injury Research 32
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies 35
- Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics 23
-
- Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders 18
-
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 8
-
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 7
- Co-authors
- Ãngel Gil-AgudoJuan C. MorenoJosé L. PonsSoraya Pérez‐NombelaAikaterini D. KoutsouAna de los Reyes-GuzmánFernando Trincado-AlonsoDiego Torricelli
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Antonio J. del‐Ama
69 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Rehabilitation 533
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 128
- Occupational Therapy 98
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 388
- Biomedical Engineering 808
Countries citing papers authored by Antonio J. del‐Ama
This map shows the geographic impact of Antonio J. del‐Ama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonio J. del‐Ama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonio J. del‐Ama more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Antonio J. del‐Ama
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonio J. del‐Ama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonio J. del‐Ama. The network helps show where Antonio J. del‐Ama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Antonio J. del‐Ama, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 45 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 17 | Testing the generation of speed-dependent gait trajectories to control a 6DoF overground exoskeleton | 2015 | 1 |
| 18 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 28 |
About Antonio J. del‐Ama
Antonio J. del‐Ama is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Occupational Therapy, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (35 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (32 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (26 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (23 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (18 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (12 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (8 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (533 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (128 citations) and Occupational Therapy (98 citations). Antonio J. del‐Ama has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ãngel Gil-Agudo, Juan C. Moreno, José L. Pons, Soraya Pérez‐Nombela, Aikaterini D. Koutsou, Ana de los Reyes-Guzmán, Fernando Trincado-Alonso, Diego Torricelli, Eduardo López‐Larraz and Vijaykumar Rajasekaran.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.