Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Williams
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Williams. The network helps show where Anthony Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony Williams.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony Williams based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony Williams. Anthony Williams is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Williams, Anthony, Jason Morton, Peter W Kilgour, & Maria T Northcote. (2018). How Engaged are Our Students? Using Analytics to Identify Students At-risk. EdMedia + Innovate Learning. 122–128.
5.
Williams, Anthony, et al.. (2017). Studio models in a changing higher education landscape. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).3 indexed citations
Sutton, Ken & Anthony Williams. (2012). Developing a discipline-based measure of visualisation. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia).4 indexed citations
8.
Askland, Hedda Haugen, Michael J. Ostwald, & Anthony Williams. (2011). ASSESSING CREATIVITY: PROPOSITION. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia). 275–280.1 indexed citations
Sutton, Ken, et al.. (2009). Spatial ability performance of female engineering students. NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia). 170.1 indexed citations
12.
Sher, Willy, et al.. (2009). Heading into new virtual environments: What skills do design team members need?. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 14(4). 17–29.20 indexed citations
13.
Sutton, Ken, et al.. (2009). Exploring spatial ability and mapping the performance of engineering students. NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia). 961.4 indexed citations
14.
Gu, Ning, et al.. (2008). Virtual worlds as a constructivist learning platform: evaluations of 3D virtual worlds on design teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 13(36). 578–593.33 indexed citations
15.
Williams, Anthony, et al.. (2004). PROFILING DESIGNERS AS A BASIS FOR ASSESSING DESIGN PERFORMANCE. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia). 1461–1466.
16.
Williams, Anthony & Thayaparan Gajendran. (2004). MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVE ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES FOR GROUP WORK. NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia). 685–690.3 indexed citations
Sher, Willy, et al.. (2002). The implementation of a university-wide electronic reflective journal to facilitate the development of core skills.. 593–601.5 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Anthony, et al.. (2002). How designers communicate ideas to each other in design meetings. NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia). 947–952.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.