Anthony Chmiel

417 total citations
21 papers, 184 citations indexed

About

Anthony Chmiel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Music. According to data from OpenAlex, Anthony Chmiel has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 184 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Social Psychology and 7 papers in Music. Recurrent topics in Anthony Chmiel's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (13 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (7 papers) and Music Therapy and Health (7 papers). Anthony Chmiel is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (13 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (7 papers) and Music Therapy and Health (7 papers). Anthony Chmiel collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Italy and United Kingdom. Anthony Chmiel's co-authors include Emery Schubert, Sandra Garrido, Jane W. Davidson, Martha Hickey, Katherine Boydell, Jennifer MacRitchie, John R. Taylor, Roger T. Dean, Joe Wolfe and Giovanni De Poli and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Voice.

In The Last Decade

Anthony Chmiel

20 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anthony Chmiel Australia 7 107 57 53 48 38 21 184
Zachary Wallmark United States 9 128 1.2× 94 1.6× 100 1.9× 40 0.8× 41 1.1× 17 221
Mónica López-González United States 5 141 1.3× 66 1.2× 62 1.2× 56 1.2× 8 0.2× 14 175
Beau Sievers United States 5 177 1.7× 91 1.6× 117 2.2× 27 0.6× 42 1.1× 8 284
Favio Shifres Argentina 8 104 1.0× 67 1.2× 34 0.6× 81 1.7× 33 0.9× 60 203
Henna‐Riikka Peltola Finland 9 210 2.0× 160 2.8× 87 1.6× 96 2.0× 29 0.8× 14 272
Mark F. Zander Germany 8 52 0.5× 61 1.1× 58 1.1× 100 2.1× 22 0.6× 8 251
Haley E. Kragness Canada 9 186 1.7× 82 1.4× 46 0.9× 60 1.3× 46 1.2× 18 216
Anthony Brandt United States 6 157 1.5× 49 0.9× 69 1.3× 37 0.8× 12 0.3× 19 224
Rebecca D. Sager 2 188 1.8× 96 1.7× 56 1.1× 81 1.7× 47 1.2× 2 275
Robert Walker Canada 8 128 1.2× 47 0.8× 93 1.8× 130 2.7× 19 0.5× 34 264

Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Chmiel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Chmiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Chmiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Chmiel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony Chmiel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Chmiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Chmiel. The network helps show where Anthony Chmiel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony Chmiel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony Chmiel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony Chmiel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony Chmiel. Anthony Chmiel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chmiel, Anthony, Roger T. Dean, Catherine Stevens, & Jennifer MacRitchie. (2025). Objective demonstration and quantitation of musical learning in older adult novices across a 12-month online study. PLoS ONE. 20(4). e0320055–e0320055.
2.
Chmiel, Anthony, et al.. (2023). Musical Activity as Avoidance-Based Emotion Regulation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence Across Continents. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 42(2). 412–438. 1 indexed citations
3.
Chmiel, Anthony, et al.. (2023). Calming effects of repetition in music for children with sensory sensitivities: Findings from two experimental studies. The Arts in Psychotherapy. 87. 102115–102115. 1 indexed citations
4.
Chmiel, Anthony, et al.. (2022). Creativity in lockdown: Understanding how music and the arts supported mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic by age group. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 993259–993259. 6 indexed citations
5.
Garrido, Sandra, et al.. (2022). Encouraging help-seeking and engagement in a mental health app: What young people want. Frontiers in Digital Health. 4. 1045765–1045765. 14 indexed citations
6.
McDonald, James A., Sergio Canazza, Anthony Chmiel, et al.. (2022). Illuminating Music: Impact of Color Hue for Background Lighting on Emotional Arousal in Piano Performance Videos. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 828699–828699. 5 indexed citations
7.
Garrido, Sandra, et al.. (2022). MoodyTunes: A mixed methods usability study of an app for adolescent mental health.. Psychomusicology Music Mind and Brain. 32(1-2). 24–32. 3 indexed citations
8.
Chmiel, Anthony, Kurt James Werner, Emery Schubert, et al.. (2022). A Workflow and Digital Filters for Correcting Speed and Equalization Errors on Digitized Audio Open-Reel Magnetic Tapes. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 70(6). 495–509. 2 indexed citations
9.
Dean, Roger T., et al.. (2022). AMMRI: a computational assessment tool for music novices’ replication and improvisation tasks. Journal of New Music Research. 51(4-5). 262–277. 1 indexed citations
10.
11.
Chmiel, Anthony, et al.. (2021). The Role of Artistic Creative Activities in Navigating the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 696202–696202. 12 indexed citations
12.
Chmiel, Anthony, Kurt James Werner, Emery Schubert, et al.. (2021). A workflow and novel digital filters for compensating speed and equalization errors on digitized audio open-reel tapes. View. 224–231. 1 indexed citations
13.
Chmiel, Anthony, et al.. (2021). Multimedia Archives: New Digital Filters to Correct Equalization Errors on Digitized Audio Tapes. Advances in Multimedia. 2021. 1–11. 3 indexed citations
14.
Chmiel, Anthony & Emery Schubert. (2020). Imaginative Enrichment Produces Higher Preference for Unusual Music Than Historical Framing: A Literature Review and Two Empirical Studies. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 1920–1920. 2 indexed citations
15.
Chmiel, Anthony & Emery Schubert. (2019). Psycho-Historical Contextualization for Music and Visual Works: A Literature Review and Comparison Between Artistic Mediums. Frontiers in Psychology. 10. 182–182. 8 indexed citations
16.
Chmiel, Anthony & Emery Schubert. (2018). Unusualness as a predictor of music preference. Musicae Scientiae. 23(4). 426–441. 13 indexed citations
17.
Chmiel, Anthony & Emery Schubert. (2018). Using Psychological Principles of Memory Storage and Preference to Improve Music Recommendation Systems. Leonardo Music Journal. 28. 77–81. 5 indexed citations
18.
Chmiel, Anthony & Emery Schubert. (2017). Back to the inverted-U for music preference: A review of the literature. Psychology of Music. 45(6). 886–909. 84 indexed citations
19.
Chmiel, Anthony & Emery Schubert. (2017). Emptying Rooms: When the Inverted-U Model of Preference Fails—An Investigation Using Music With Collative Extremes. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 36(2). 199–221. 6 indexed citations
20.
Chmiel, Anthony, et al.. (2015). Performing Lieder: Expert Perspectives and Comparison of Vibrato and Singer's Formant With Opera Singers. Journal of Voice. 29(5). 645.e15–645.e32. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026