Anthea Hucklesby
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Law top 5%
- Co-authors
- Emma WincupMary CorcoranEmma M. MarshallMiranda BooneKristel BeyensStuart ListerRick SarreGill McIvor
- Topics
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (8 papers)Policing Practices and Perceptions (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsAustralia
In The Last Decade
Anthea Hucklesby
21 papers receiving 279 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Sociology and Political Science 262
- Clinical Psychology 106
- General Health Professions 69
- Political Science and International Relations 50
- Law 39
Countries citing papers authored by Anthea Hucklesby
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthea Hucklesby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthea Hucklesby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthea Hucklesby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anthea Hucklesby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthea Hucklesby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthea Hucklesby. The network helps show where Anthea Hucklesby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthea Hucklesby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthea Hucklesby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthea Hucklesby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anthea Hucklesby. Anthea Hucklesby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | Creativity and effectiveness in the use of electronic monitoring: a case study of five European jurisdictions | 6 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | Electronic monitoring of offenders: key developments | 5 |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | The impact of recent changes in pesticide legislation on the fresh produce industry - a supplier's perspective. | 1 |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Anthea Hucklesby
Anthea Hucklesby is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (14 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (8 papers) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (262 citations), Clinical Psychology (106 citations) and Law (39 citations). Anthea Hucklesby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Emma Wincup, Mary Corcoran, Emma M. Marshall, Miranda Boone, Kristel Beyens, Stuart Lister, Rick Sarre, Gill McIvor, Frieder Dünkel and George Mair. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Policy, Punishment & Society and Journal of Law and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.