Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
- Authors
- Anselm L. StraussJuliet Corbin
- Journal
- Sage eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3171053 →Countries where authors are citing Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
This map shows the geographic impact of Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
This network shows the impact of Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.
About Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
This paper, published in 1998, received 27.8k indexed citations . Written by Anselm L. Strauss and Juliet Corbin. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (7.3k citations), Education (6.2k citations) and General Health Professions (4.3k citations). Published in Sage eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3171053.