Countries citing papers authored by Anselm Haverkamp
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anselm Haverkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anselm Haverkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anselm Haverkamp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anselm Haverkamp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anselm Haverkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anselm Haverkamp. The network helps show where Anselm Haverkamp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anselm Haverkamp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anselm Haverkamp.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anselm Haverkamp based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anselm Haverkamp. Anselm Haverkamp is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Haverkamp, Anselm. (2010). Shakespearean Genealogies of Power: A Whispering of Nothing in Hamlet, Richard II, Julius Caesar, Macbeth, The Merchant of Venice, and The Winter’s Tale. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
4.
Haverkamp, Anselm, et al.. (2009). Metaphorologie : zur Praxis von Theorie. Suhrkamp eBooks.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.