Anouk Goemans

1.6k total citations
26 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Anouk Goemans is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anouk Goemans has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Clinical Psychology, 19 papers in Safety Research and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Anouk Goemans's work include Child Welfare and Adoption (19 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (12 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers). Anouk Goemans is often cited by papers focused on Child Welfare and Adoption (19 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (12 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers). Anouk Goemans collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and New Zealand. Anouk Goemans's co-authors include Paul Vedder, Mitch van Geel, Gianluca Gini, Eamon McCrory, Essi Viding, Michael Tarren‐Sweeney, Femmie Juffer, Nikita K. Schoemaker, Harriet J. Vermeer and Lenneke R. A. Alink and has published in prestigious journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Development and Psychopathology and Psychiatry Research.

In The Last Decade

Anouk Goemans

26 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Anouk Goemans

SPS

EDUCA

Katie L. Cotter United States

Miranda Sentse Netherlands

Gabriel J. Merrin United States

Hannah L. Schacter United States

Asha Goldweber United States

Stacey Waters Australia

Heather Brittain Canada

Amanda Krygsman Canada

Andrea Hopmeyer Gorman United States

Alberto Valido United States

Katie L. Cotter United States

Anouk Goemans

546 ×0.7

558 ×1.2

230 ×0.5

215 ×0.6

SPS

329 ×1.9

EDUCA

Citations per year, relative to Anouk Goemans Anouk Goemans (= 1×) peers Katie L. Cotter

Countries citing papers authored by Anouk Goemans

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anouk Goemans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anouk Goemans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anouk Goemans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anouk Goemans

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anouk Goemans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anouk Goemans. The network helps show where Anouk Goemans may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anouk Goemans

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anouk Goemans. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anouk Goemans based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anouk Goemans. Anouk Goemans is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Goemans, Anouk, et al.. (2020). Predictors of quality of life among youths in foster care—a 5-year prospective follow-up study. Quality of Life Research. 30(2). 543–554. 11 indexed citations

Goemans, Anouk, et al.. (2020). Family Reunification Decision-Making in Dutch Family Foster Care: A Dual Perspective Approach. Child & Youth Care Forum. 50(2). 199–228. 4 indexed citations

Schoemaker, Nikita K., et al.. (2019). A meta-analytic review of parenting interventions in foster care and adoption. Development and Psychopathology. 32(3). 1149–1172. 54 indexed citations

Tarren‐Sweeney, Michael, et al.. (2019). Mental health screening for children in care using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Brief Assessment Checklists: Guidance from three national studies. University of Canterbury Research Repository (University of Canterbury). 1(2). 177–196. 10 indexed citations

Tarren‐Sweeney, Michael & Anouk Goemans. (2019). A narrative review of stability and change in the mental health of children who grow up in family-based out-of-home care. University of Canterbury Research Repository (University of Canterbury). 1(3). 273–294. 14 indexed citations

Geel, Mitch van, et al.. (2018). Does peer victimization predict low self-esteem, or does low self-esteem predict peer victimization? Meta-analyses on longitudinal studies. Developmental Review. 49. 31–40. 116 indexed citations

Goemans, Anouk, Mitch van Geel, Tom F. Wilderjans, Joost R. van Ginkel, & Paul Vedder. (2018). Predictors of school engagement in foster children: A longitudinal study. Children and Youth Services Review. 88. 33–43. 14 indexed citations

Goemans, Anouk, Mitch van Geel, & Paul Vedder. (2018). Variability in Developmental Outcomes of Foster Children: Implications for Research and Practice. Children Australia. 43(2). 116–123. 8 indexed citations

Goemans, Anouk, Mitch van Geel, & Paul Vedder. (2017). Foster children’s behavioral development and foster parent stress: testing a transactional model. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 27(3). 990–1001. 35 indexed citations

10.

Goemans, Anouk, Michael Tarren‐Sweeney, Mitch van Geel, & Paul Vedder. (2017). Psychosocial screening and monitoring for children in foster care: Psychometric properties of the Brief Assessment Checklist in a Dutch population study. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 23(1). 9–24. 18 indexed citations

11.

Vanderfaeillie, Johan, et al.. (2017). Foster care placement breakdown in the Netherlands and Flanders: Prevalence, precursors, and associated factors. Child & Family Social Work. 23(3). 337–345. 23 indexed citations

12.

Geel, Mitch van, et al.. (2016). Are Youth Psychopathic Traits Related to Bullying? Meta-analyses on Callous-Unemotional Traits, Narcissism, and Impulsivity. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. 48(5). 768–777. 52 indexed citations

13.

Goemans, Anouk, Mitch van Geel, & Paul Vedder. (2016). Psychosocial functioning in Dutch foster children: The relationship with child, family, and placement characteristics. Child Abuse & Neglect. 56. 30–43. 20 indexed citations

14.

Goemans, Anouk, et al.. (2016). Developmental Outcomes of Foster Children. Child Maltreatment. 21(3). 198–217. 82 indexed citations

15.

Goemans, Anouk, et al.. (2016). Reunification of foster children: Factors associated with reunification outcomes in Flanders and the Netherlands. Children and Youth Services Review. 70. 284–292. 13 indexed citations

16.

Geel, Mitch van, Anouk Goemans, & Paul Vedder. (2015). The relation between peer victimization and sleeping problems: A meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 27. 89–95. 122 indexed citations

17.

Geel, Mitch van, Anouk Goemans, & Paul Vedder. (2015). A meta-analysis on the relation between peer victimization and adolescent non-suicidal self-injury. Psychiatry Research. 230(2). 364–368. 102 indexed citations

18.

Vedder, Paul, Mettina Veenstra, Anouk Goemans, & Mitch van Geel. (2015). Perspectiefbepaling in de pleegzorg. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 54(3). 115–127. 1 indexed citations

19.

Goemans, Anouk, Mitch van Geel, & Paul Vedder. (2015). Over three decades of longitudinal research on the development of foster children: A meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect. 42. 121–134. 118 indexed citations

20.

Goemans, Anouk, Mitch van Geel, Paul Vedder, & Robert H. Bradley. (2014). HOME in the Netherlands. Journal of Family Issues. 37(15). 2118–2137. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact