Annie Weir

637 citations
27 papers · 413 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Annie Weir

26 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Annie Weir
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Neurology 143
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 25
  • Physiology 124
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 63
  • Neurology 25
Replace William J. Estrin with:
William J. Estrin United States
Özlem Taşkapılıoğlu Türkiye
Ko‐Pei Kao Taiwan
J Calderón Chile
Robert Zanner Germany
Ashesh A. Thaker United States
P. Gulbrandsen Norway
Eva Schäffer Germany
Serpil Demirci Türkiye
Patrick T. Kiernan United States
Annie Weir relative to William J. Estrin United States William J. Estrin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
William J. Estrin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annie Weir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annie Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annie Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annie Weir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annie Weir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annie Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annie Weir. The network helps show where Annie Weir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Annie Weir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annie Weir Line = papers co-authored together Annie Weir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985111
2 198543
3 201332
4 198530
5 198726
6 198923
7 198021
8 197921
9 199116
10 199314
11 198811
12 20159
13 19828
14
COMMON FREQUENCY COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED FROM CORRELATIONS BETWEEN MAGNETIC RECORDINGS OF CORTICAL ACTIVITY AND THE ELECTROMYOGRAM IN MAN
19957
15 20176
16 19876
17 19795
18 20204
19 19984
20
Assuring Quality in Higher Education: The New Zealand Experience.
20094

About Annie Weir

Annie Weir is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infrared Thermography in Medicine (4 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (2 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (2 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (2 papers) and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (143 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (25 citations), Physiology (124 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (63 citations) and Neurology (25 citations). Annie Weir has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include J. P. Ballantyne, G A Jamal, S Hansen, S Hansen, Peter G. E. Kennedy, Christa Fouché, D.C.W. Sanderson, A.J. Cresswell, David L. Davies and DJ Kerr. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Postgraduate Medical Journal, Clinical Radiology, Diabetic Medicine and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact