Anni Sternisko

1.3k total citations
9 papers, 365 citations indexed

About

Anni Sternisko is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Anni Sternisko has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 365 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Anni Sternisko's work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). Anni Sternisko is often cited by papers focused on Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). Anni Sternisko collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Anni Sternisko's co-authors include Aleksandra Cichocka, Jay J. Van Bavel, Aleksandra Cisłak, Steve Rathje, Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Claire Robertson, Elizabeth Harris, Bjarki Gronfeldt, Ana P. Gantman and Gabriele Oettingen and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Anni Sternisko

8 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anni Sternisko United States 5 309 95 86 72 49 9 365
Myrto Pantazi Belgium 10 333 1.1× 93 1.0× 107 1.2× 108 1.5× 36 0.7× 18 384
Mathias Osmundsen Denmark 7 409 1.3× 196 2.1× 103 1.2× 80 1.1× 76 1.6× 12 492
Rakoen Maertens United Kingdom 10 475 1.5× 165 1.7× 115 1.3× 53 0.7× 43 0.9× 16 543
Moreno Mancosu Italy 11 351 1.1× 142 1.5× 90 1.0× 31 0.4× 25 0.5× 42 447
Emily Kubin United States 7 275 0.9× 207 2.2× 57 0.7× 32 0.4× 56 1.1× 15 437
Killian Lorcan McLoughlin United States 6 187 0.6× 83 0.9× 57 0.7× 55 0.8× 48 1.0× 8 284
Fatih Uenal United Kingdom 8 278 0.9× 68 0.7× 50 0.6× 35 0.5× 46 0.9× 9 321
Péter Krekó Hungary 11 325 1.1× 94 1.0× 63 0.7× 61 0.8× 37 0.8× 26 454
María Chayinska Italy 11 262 0.8× 67 0.7× 29 0.3× 53 0.7× 101 2.1× 27 319
Ali Mashuri Indonesia 11 318 1.0× 49 0.5× 44 0.5× 52 0.7× 102 2.1× 41 358

Countries citing papers authored by Anni Sternisko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anni Sternisko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anni Sternisko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anni Sternisko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anni Sternisko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anni Sternisko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anni Sternisko. The network helps show where Anni Sternisko may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anni Sternisko

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anni Sternisko. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anni Sternisko based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anni Sternisko. Anni Sternisko is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
2.
Sternisko, Anni, Sylvain Delouvée, & Jay J. Van Bavel. (2022). Clarifying the relationship between randomness dismissal and conspiracist ideation: A preregistered replication and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 102. 104357–104357. 2 indexed citations
3.
Gronfeldt, Bjarki, et al.. (2022). A Small Price to Pay: National Narcissism Predicts Readiness to Sacrifice In-Group Members to Defend the In-Group’s Image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 49(4). 612–626. 27 indexed citations
4.
Bavel, Jay Joseph Van, Steve Rathje, Elizabeth Harris, Claire Robertson, & Anni Sternisko. (2021). How social media shapes polarization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 25(11). 913–916. 101 indexed citations
5.
Bavel, Jay Joseph Van, Steve Rathje, Elizabeth Harris, Claire Robertson, & Anni Sternisko. (2021). How social media shapes polarization. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
6.
Sternisko, Anni, Aleksandra Cichocka, Aleksandra Cisłak, & Jay J. Van Bavel. (2021). National Narcissism predicts the Belief in and the Dissemination of Conspiracy Theories During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From 56 Countries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 49(1). 48–65. 105 indexed citations
7.
Sternisko, Anni, Aleksandra Cichocka, & Jay J. Van Bavel. (2020). The dark side of social movements: social identity, non-conformity, and the lure of conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology. 35. 1–6. 114 indexed citations
8.
Gantman, Ana P., Anni Sternisko, Peter M. Gollwitzer, Gabriele Oettingen, & Jay J. Van Bavel. (2020). Allocating moral responsibility to multiple agents. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 91. 104027–104027. 9 indexed citations
9.
Sternisko, Anni, et al.. (2017). One-sighted: How visual attention biases legal decision-making. 105–139. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026