Annette Denker
About
In The Last Decade
Annette Denker
7 papers receiving 639 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Molecular Biology 523
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 208
- Cell Biology 192
- Plant Science 115
- Genetics 66
Countries citing papers authored by Annette Denker
This map shows the geographic impact of Annette Denker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annette Denker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annette Denker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annette Denker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annette Denker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annette Denker. The network helps show where Annette Denker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annette Denker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annette Denker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annette Denker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annette Denker. Annette Denker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 78 | |
| 2 | 237 | |
| 3 | 69 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 95 | |
| 6 | 83 | |
| 7 | 35 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.