Annelijn E. Slaman

927 total citations
15 papers, 636 citations indexed

About

Annelijn E. Slaman is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Gastroenterology. According to data from OpenAlex, Annelijn E. Slaman has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 636 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 13 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Gastroenterology. Recurrent topics in Annelijn E. Slaman's work include Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (12 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (11 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (8 papers). Annelijn E. Slaman is often cited by papers focused on Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (12 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (11 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (8 papers). Annelijn E. Slaman collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and United States. Annelijn E. Slaman's co-authors include Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Richard van Hillegersberg, Camiel Rosman, Sjoerd M. Lagarde, Lucas Goense, Bas P. L. Wijnhoven, Frans van Workum, Frits J. H. van den Wildenberg and Misha Luyer and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and Annals of Surgical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Annelijn E. Slaman

15 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annelijn E. Slaman Netherlands 10 557 507 63 55 55 15 636
Leonie R. van der Werf Netherlands 12 398 0.7× 367 0.7× 84 1.3× 36 0.7× 38 0.7× 20 467
Linde A. D. Busweiler Netherlands 9 301 0.5× 270 0.5× 107 1.7× 40 0.7× 31 0.6× 14 400
Nicole van der Wielen Netherlands 12 570 1.0× 533 1.1× 61 1.0× 22 0.4× 75 1.4× 17 640
Madhan Kumar Kuppusamy United States 9 306 0.5× 201 0.4× 28 0.4× 32 0.6× 37 0.7× 18 326
Xavier Escofet United Kingdom 11 298 0.5× 269 0.5× 74 1.2× 17 0.3× 31 0.6× 25 418
S Thrumurthy United Kingdom 6 310 0.6× 325 0.6× 27 0.4× 90 1.6× 28 0.5× 8 417
Andrei Cocieru United States 11 235 0.4× 148 0.3× 97 1.5× 47 0.9× 80 1.5× 19 307
Pernilla Viklund Sweden 11 528 0.9× 402 0.8× 77 1.2× 16 0.3× 46 0.8× 13 592
So Hyun Kang South Korea 11 217 0.4× 204 0.4× 65 1.0× 39 0.7× 79 1.4× 41 315
Daan M. Voeten Netherlands 11 256 0.5× 173 0.3× 45 0.7× 54 1.0× 11 0.2× 25 302

Countries citing papers authored by Annelijn E. Slaman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annelijn E. Slaman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annelijn E. Slaman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annelijn E. Slaman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annelijn E. Slaman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annelijn E. Slaman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annelijn E. Slaman. The network helps show where Annelijn E. Slaman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annelijn E. Slaman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annelijn E. Slaman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annelijn E. Slaman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annelijn E. Slaman. Annelijn E. Slaman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Slaman, Annelijn E., Giovanni Pirozzolo, Wietse J. Eshuis, et al.. (2022). Improved Clinical and Survival Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer Over 25 Years. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 114(4). 1118–1126. 11 indexed citations
2.
Slaman, Annelijn E., Wietse J. Eshuis, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, & Suzanne S. Gisbertz. (2022). Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the “flap and wrap” reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer. Diseases of the Esophagus. 36(1). 7 indexed citations
3.
Verstegen, Moniek, Annelijn E. Slaman, Bastiaan Klarenbeek, et al.. (2021). Outcomes of Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Transhiatal, McKeown or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study. World Journal of Surgery. 45(11). 3341–3349. 15 indexed citations
4.
Klevebro, Fredrik, Jessie A. Elliott, Annelijn E. Slaman, et al.. (2019). Cardiorespiratory Comorbidity and Postoperative Complications following Esophagectomy: a European Multicenter Cohort Study. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 26(9). 2864–2873. 47 indexed citations
5.
Gooszen, J. A. H., Annelijn E. Slaman, Susan van Dieren, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, & Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen. (2018). Incidence and Treatment of Symptomatic Diaphragmatic Hernia After Esophagectomy for Cancer. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 106(1). 199–206. 26 indexed citations
6.
Saadeh, Luca, Annelijn E. Slaman, Eleonora Pinto, et al.. (2018). Esophageal cancer patients’ information management: cross-cultural differences between Dutch and Italian patients in perceived quality of provided oncological information. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 10(8). 5123–5130. 2 indexed citations
7.
Workum, Frans van, Annelijn E. Slaman, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, et al.. (2018). Propensity Score–Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy. Annals of Surgery. 271(1). 128–133. 58 indexed citations
8.
Mège, Diane, Lieven Depypere, Annelijn E. Slaman, et al.. (2018). RA05.01: SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL SARCOMA: A MULTICENTER EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE. Diseases of the Esophagus. 31(Supplement_1). 26–27. 2 indexed citations
9.
Mège, Diane, Lieven Depypere, Guillaume Piessen, et al.. (2018). Surgical management of esophageal sarcoma: a multicenter European experience. Diseases of the Esophagus. 31(3). 5 indexed citations
10.
Brenkman, Hylke J.F., Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Annelijn E. Slaman, et al.. (2017). Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy Versus Open Gastrectomy During the Early Introduction of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in the Netherlands. Annals of Surgery. 266(5). 831–838. 47 indexed citations
11.
Seesing, Maarten F. J., Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Lucas Goense, et al.. (2017). A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands. Annals of Surgery. 266(5). 839–846. 160 indexed citations
12.
Workum, Frans van, Gijs H. K. Berkelmans, Annelijn E. Slaman, et al.. (2017). Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Annals of Surgery. 269(1). 88–94. 188 indexed citations
13.
Slaman, Annelijn E., Pieter van Hagen, Ate van der Gaast, et al.. (2016). Using the Comprehensive Complication Index to Assess the Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on Complication Severity After Esophagectomy for Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 23(12). 3964–3971. 37 indexed citations
14.
Slaman, Annelijn E., et al.. (2015). Trigger tool versus verbal inventory to detect surgical complications. Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery. 400(7). 821–830. 2 indexed citations
15.
Slaman, Annelijn E., Sjoerd M. Lagarde, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, & Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen. (2015). A Quantified Scoring System for Postoperative Complication Severity Compared to the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Digestive Surgery. 32(5). 361–366. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026