Annelies E. van Eeden
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Rheumatology
- Co-authors
- Hans W. HoekDaphne van HoekenAlbertine J. OldehinkelRob G. H. H. NelissenP. Eline SlagboomNico LakenbergBarry A. PepersFons J. Verbeek
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers)Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of the Rheumatic DiseasesInternational Journal of Eating DisordersCurrent Opinion in Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Annelies E. van Eeden
9 papers receiving 484 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Clinical Psychology 361
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 114
- Psychiatry and Mental health 96
- Sociology and Political Science 80
- Rheumatology 59
Countries citing papers authored by Annelies E. van Eeden
This map shows the geographic impact of Annelies E. van Eeden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annelies E. van Eeden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annelies E. van Eeden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annelies E. van Eeden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annelies E. van Eeden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annelies E. van Eeden. The network helps show where Annelies E. van Eeden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annelies E. van Eeden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annelies E. van Eeden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annelies E. van Eeden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annelies E. van Eeden. Annelies E. van Eeden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | Incidence, prevalence and mortality of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosabreakdown → | 361 |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 74 | |
| 9 | [Drug-promoting advertisements in the Dutch Journal of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Weekly: not always evidence based]. | 1 |
About Annelies E. van Eeden
Annelies E. van Eeden is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (361 citations), Pharmacy (38 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (96 citations). Annelies E. van Eeden has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans W. Hoek, Daphne van Hoeken, Albertine J. Oldehinkel, Rob G. H. H. Nelissen, P. Eline Slagboom, Nico Lakenberg, Barry A. Pepers, Fons J. Verbeek, Willeke van Roon‐Mom and Nils Bömer. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, International Journal of Eating Disorders and Current Opinion in Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.