Anne‐Caroline Schmöle
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 10%
- Organic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Joanna Agnieszka Komorowska‐MüllerMoritz J. FrechArndt RolfsAndreas ZimmerStefanie OrtinauRayk HübnerMatthias BellerAnahit Pews‐Davtyan
- Topics
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers)Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (5 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEBiochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Anne‐Caroline Schmöle
14 papers receiving 555 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Pharmacology 258
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 212
- Molecular Biology 168
- Neurology 101
- Organic Chemistry 75
Countries citing papers authored by Anne‐Caroline Schmöle
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne‐Caroline Schmöle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne‐Caroline Schmöle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne‐Caroline Schmöle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne‐Caroline Schmöle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne‐Caroline Schmöle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne‐Caroline Schmöle. The network helps show where Anne‐Caroline Schmöle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne‐Caroline Schmöle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne‐Caroline Schmöle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne‐Caroline Schmöle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne‐Caroline Schmöle. Anne‐Caroline Schmöle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 112 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 49 | |
| 7 | 75 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 85 | |
| 12 | 56 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 43 |
About Anne‐Caroline Schmöle
Anne‐Caroline Schmöle is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Neurology and Pharmacology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (5 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (56 citations), Pharmacology (258 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (56 citations). Anne‐Caroline Schmöle has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joanna Agnieszka Komorowska‐Müller, Moritz J. Frech, Arndt Rolfs, Andreas Zimmer, Stefanie Ortinau, Rayk Hübner, Matthias Beller, Anahit Pews‐Davtyan, Eva C. Beins and Thomas Ulas. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.