Anne van Linge
About
In The Last Decade
Anne van Linge
12 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Epidemiology 131
- Neurology 126
- Neurology 88
- Surgery 64
- Oncology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Anne van Linge
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne van Linge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne van Linge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne van Linge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne van Linge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne van Linge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne van Linge. The network helps show where Anne van Linge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne van Linge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne van Linge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne van Linge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne van Linge. Anne van Linge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 69 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 65 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.