Countries citing papers authored by Anne van Aaken
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne van Aaken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne van Aaken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne van Aaken more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne van Aaken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne van Aaken. The network helps show where Anne van Aaken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne van Aaken
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne van Aaken.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne van Aaken based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anne van Aaken. Anne van Aaken is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Franck, Susan D., et al.. (2015). The Diversity Challenge: Exploring the "Invisible College" of International Arbitration. Columbia journal of transnational law. 53(3). 429–506.7 indexed citations
7.
Aaken, Anne van. (2014). Behavioral International Law and Economics. Harvard international law journal. 55(2). 421–481.7 indexed citations
8.
Aaken, Anne van. (2014). Delegating Interpretative Authority in Investment Treaties : The Case of Joint Commissions. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 11(1).1 indexed citations
9.
Aaken, Anne van, et al.. (2012). Interdisciplinary Research in Jurisprudence and Constitutionalism.1 indexed citations
10.
Aaken, Anne van. (2012). A functional approach to international constitutionalism. 154–171.2 indexed citations
11.
Kurtz, Jürgen & Anne van Aaken. (2011). Prudence or Discrimination? Emergency Measures, the Global Financial Crisis and International Economic Law. TDM. 8(3).2 indexed citations
12.
Aaken, Anne van. (2009). International Investment Law between Commitment and Flexibility: A Contract Theory Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
13.
Aaken, Anne van. (2008). Fragmentation of International Law: The Case of International Investment Protection. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 91–130.3 indexed citations
14.
Aaken, Anne van. (2008). A Functional Approach to International Constitutionalism: The Value Added of a Social Science Contribution. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 155–171.1 indexed citations
15.
Ginsburg, Tom, Christoph Engel, & Anne van Aaken. (2008). Symposium: Public International Law and Economics - Introduction. University of Illinois law review. 2008. 1.1 indexed citations
16.
Aaken, Anne van, Tom Ginsburg, & Christoph Engel. (2007). Public International Law and Economics Symposium Introduction. SSRN Electronic Journal.
17.
Grözinger, Gerd & Anne van Aaken. (2004). Inequality - New Analytical Approaches.2 indexed citations
18.
Aaken, Anne van & Gerd Grözinger. (2004). Ungleichheit und Umverteilung. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.1 indexed citations
19.
Aaken, Anne van. (2003). Rational Choice in der Rechtswissenschaft : Zum Stellenwert der ökonomischen Theorie im Recht. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen).2 indexed citations
20.
Aaken, Anne van, et al.. (2002). Konsens als Grundnorm? Chancen und Grenzen der Ordnungsökonomik in der normativen Theorie des Rechts. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 88(1). 28–50.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.